Business Potential for Agricultural Biotechnology - Asian Productivity ...
Business Potential for Agricultural Biotechnology - Asian Productivity ...
Business Potential for Agricultural Biotechnology - Asian Productivity ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>Business</strong> <strong>Potential</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>Agricultural</strong> <strong>Biotechnology</strong> Products<br />
are produced, only one is selected, based on stringent per<strong>for</strong>mance standards, as the source <strong>for</strong><br />
all the varieties eventually sold commercially. Be<strong>for</strong>e any food crop produced using modern biotechnology<br />
can be marketed, the food product must undergo multiple years of rigorous safety<br />
assessment. Steps in taking a proof of concept from the laboratory to the market include those in<br />
the R&D phase—desired traits identified, genes tagged and mapped, trans<strong>for</strong>mation process<br />
under biosafety purview, phenotype evaluation in contained environment, open field tests under<br />
supervision of biosafety regulators—and the commercialization phase—deregulation approval<br />
based on scientific review of data and public hearings, incorporation into commercial variety,<br />
multilocation per<strong>for</strong>mance trials, seed certification boards’ approval <strong>for</strong> multiplication use, and<br />
food/feed use approval <strong>for</strong> consumption. National and international regulatory authorities require<br />
that food produced through biotechnology must meet the same safety standards as food grown<br />
conventionally, that is, there must be “reasonable certainty that no harm will result from intended<br />
uses under the anticipated conditions of consumption.” The food safety standard <strong>for</strong><br />
biotech food there<strong>for</strong>e is that these foods must be “as safe as” food produced by conventional<br />
methods. The comprehensive safety testing described above provides a thorough assessment of<br />
potential risks relevant to food safety, all in a comparative assessment with foods derived from<br />
conventional crop varieties. It is through this holistic approach that regulatory agencies around<br />
the world have repeatedly concluded that foods derived from biotech crops are as safe and nutritious<br />
as foods developed through other technologies. Above and beyond regulatory requirements,<br />
producers of GM crops assure the biosafety and food safety of their products through product<br />
stewardship by providing the subsequent after-sales support to ensure that the product is<br />
properly used, including, among other things, resistance management schemes especially <strong>for</strong> the<br />
insect-protected products (Bt corn, Bt cotton), and detection techniques. There have been about<br />
25,000 field trials in 45 countries on 60 crop species without a single ecological accident—an<br />
impeccable record of government-supervised field trials.<br />
Successful commercialization of crop biotech requires not just sound technology relevant to<br />
farmers’ needs, but also a supporting environment. Public knowledge, attitudes, and perception<br />
of GM products are very important factors that ultimately determine whether GM crops will<br />
make an important contribution to the world’s food supply. It is important that public concerns<br />
be recognized and properly addressed. Some of these have to do with the environment—regulation<br />
of field releases, outcrossing, and effects on nontarget organisms—and food safety—the<br />
safety assessment process, regulation, the presence of allergens or toxins, nutritional value, and<br />
the presence of antibiotic resistance markers. Being aware of the issues helps the scientist understand<br />
and generate data to address them. Science currently addresses these concerns very well.<br />
There are elements of risk, but these are far outweighed by the benefits.<br />
HIGHLIGHTS OF THE COUNTRY PAPERS<br />
Marching Towards the Market: The <strong>Business</strong> <strong>Potential</strong> of <strong>Agricultural</strong> <strong>Biotechnology</strong> in<br />
the Republic of China<br />
Due to its high application potential, and in order to accelerate its development, biotechnology<br />
was included by the government in 1982 among the eight key areas of research. Many<br />
related education and training programs were also initiated at this time. The Development Center<br />
<strong>for</strong> <strong>Biotechnology</strong> (DCB), the first autonomous and nonprofit organization specifically <strong>for</strong> biotechnological<br />
research, was established in 1984. After nearly a decade of ef<strong>for</strong>t, the research<br />
gradually proceeded to more practical and important activities, including the development of<br />
transgenic plants and animals, DNA-based genotyping <strong>for</strong> breeding, and the development of biopesticides,<br />
biofertilizer, and animal vaccines. From the late 1980s to the middle 1990s, important<br />
regulations and guidelines concerning biotechnology and biosafety were established by the government.<br />
The Experimental Rule of Recombinant DNA was issued by the National Science<br />
Council (NSC) and the Guidelines <strong>for</strong> Risk Assessment in GM Plants and GM Animals by the<br />
– 8 –