09.01.2013 Views

Bill Wrobel's DVD - Film Score Rundowns

Bill Wrobel's DVD - Film Score Rundowns

Bill Wrobel's DVD - Film Score Rundowns

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

although it is no classic. There’s a really neat process shot—a so-called “freeze-frame”<br />

shot-- at 00:11:10 that actually lasts several seconds as the gasoline attendant (Frank<br />

Cady) gives directions to Shelley Carnes (Ruth Roman). In the distance is a storm acoming,<br />

and to the side are Joshua trees. The location is supposed to be Texas, but you<br />

can only find Joshua trees in California and maybe a few places in Mexico in the<br />

Southwest. You don’t find them in Texas. Richard Todd, a steely Brit with a distinct<br />

voice, would’ve been cast well as Jason in Jason & the Argonauts if he were the same<br />

age then in 1963 as “now” (in 1951). Ruth Roman was excellent the year before in Dallas<br />

with Gary Cooper. Nice desert scenes (in California!) substituting for west Texas<br />

somewhere. Didn’t see any giant ants, though—although I don’t think they show up until<br />

1954!<br />

The Main Title music is dynamically dramatic. I like it! The total score is decent,<br />

middle-drawer Steiner movie, although it was never a high priority for me to ever spend<br />

the time to pull it at Warner Bros. Archives. Of the 1951 scores Max did, I was much<br />

more interested in Distant Drums, Jim Thorpe, I Was A Communist for the F.B.I—all<br />

three of which I had pulled for me. I wanted to have Raton Pass pulled too but it was a<br />

low priority, and I never got around to it.<br />

*****************************<br />

-A.I.: Artificial Intelligence (2001) ** 1/2 [music ***]<br />

http://www.amazon.com/I-Artificial-Intelligence-Widescreen-Two-<br />

Disc/dp/B00003CXXP/ref=sr_1_2?s=dvd&ie=UTF8&qid=1292890562&sr=1-2<br />

Strange futuristic movie with Williams composing a strange futuristic-type score.<br />

As with the past, the future is a bit removed from the emotional, here & now present. I<br />

get this alienating sense about the movie. This future is a long probable distance from us<br />

in terms of time, but I already feel distant towards the movie. My wife, upon seeing it<br />

again right now while she is in the kitchen making beef for Miss Kitty, says that she<br />

“never liked that movie.”<br />

In certain terms, the “Mechas” in the movie initially that we focus on--David<br />

(played by Haley Joel Osment) and his new super toy, Teddy, that “Mommie Monica”<br />

got for him—remind me of the two robots in Star Wars, R2-D2 and C3PO. The<br />

interaction is obviously not the same but for some reason I sense a sense (probably the<br />

simple fact that they are all sophisticated robots). The primary root assumption these<br />

movies suggest is that robots have consciousness, that they are “alive” just as “organics”<br />

(human beings). Instead of being human beings, they are robot beings. Well, this root<br />

assumption in science fiction movies and television series (for example “Data” in Star<br />

Trek: The Next Generation) makes for interesting entertainment, and I like some of these<br />

robot characters (such as “Data”). But this root assumption is also a false belief, a mighty<br />

huge suspension of belief that irritates me, especially when I see someone of Spielberg’s<br />

caliber fall for it. Even if he fundamentally doesn’t, and utilizes it for the sake of the story<br />

(and to promote as best he can Kubrick’s original conception), he nevertheless attempts<br />

to manipulate the viewer. At least with E.T. the creature was actually a being, a<br />

193

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!