11.01.2013 Views

legal and social conditions for asylum seekers and refugees in ...

legal and social conditions for asylum seekers and refugees in ...

legal and social conditions for asylum seekers and refugees in ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Quota <strong>refugees</strong><br />

French legislation does not <strong>in</strong>clude any provision <strong>for</strong> quota <strong>refugees</strong>.<br />

Other types of residence permit<br />

Territorial <strong>asylum</strong><br />

Although it has been granted <strong>in</strong> practice to some Algerians s<strong>in</strong>ce December 1992, the concept of<br />

“territorial <strong>asylum</strong>” was explicitly <strong>in</strong>troduced <strong>in</strong>to French legislation by Law of 11 May 1998.<br />

Accord<strong>in</strong>g to Section 13 of the Asylum Act, “[i]n consistency with the national <strong>in</strong>terest <strong>and</strong> after<br />

consultation with the M<strong>in</strong>istry of Foreign Affairs, the M<strong>in</strong>istry of Interior can grant territorial <strong>asylum</strong><br />

to an alien who can prove that his life or freedom are at risk or that he fears treatments contrary<br />

to Article 3 of the European Convention <strong>for</strong> the Protection of Human Rights <strong>and</strong> Fundamental<br />

Freedoms”.<br />

In a circular of 25 June 1998 implement<strong>in</strong>g the new provision, the M<strong>in</strong>ister of Interior restricted the<br />

scope of territorial <strong>asylum</strong> by <strong>in</strong>dicat<strong>in</strong>g that the status could be granted to an alien whose life or<br />

freedom are at risk or who fears treatments contrary to Article 3 of the ECHR “if these threats or<br />

risks are orig<strong>in</strong>ated by a person or a group which cannot be assimilated to the state authorities”.<br />

By decision of 26 January 2000, however, the Council of State (Conseil d’Etat”, France’s highest<br />

court <strong>in</strong> adm<strong>in</strong>istrative matters) cancelled this restrictive provision <strong>and</strong> stated that territorial<br />

<strong>asylum</strong> could not be limited to threats issued by non-state agents, but should apply equally to<br />

victims of state violence.<br />

In practice, the OFPRA or the Appeal Board <strong>for</strong> Refugees, after hav<strong>in</strong>g rejected an <strong>asylum</strong><br />

application, can <strong>in</strong><strong>for</strong>m the M<strong>in</strong>ister of Interior or the M<strong>in</strong>ister’s local representative (“Préfet” –<br />

Prefect) that the applicant does not fall with<strong>in</strong> the provisions of the Geneva Convention, but that<br />

his/her “life <strong>and</strong> freedom” would be at risk <strong>in</strong> case of return <strong>and</strong> that he/she should there<strong>for</strong>e be<br />

granted territorial <strong>asylum</strong>. In 1998, this happened <strong>in</strong> about 30 cases.<br />

It is also possible to lodge an application <strong>for</strong> territorial <strong>asylum</strong> with the Prefecture simultaneously<br />

with an application <strong>for</strong> <strong>asylum</strong>. In such case, however, the application <strong>for</strong> territorial <strong>asylum</strong> is<br />

automatically suspended until a decision on <strong>asylum</strong> has been made. Applicants may also choose<br />

to lodge a request <strong>for</strong> territorial <strong>asylum</strong> but no application <strong>for</strong> <strong>asylum</strong>, or to lodge the request <strong>for</strong><br />

territorial <strong>asylum</strong> after their application <strong>for</strong> <strong>asylum</strong> has been rejected.<br />

Neither the Asylum Act nor the above-mentioned circular of 25 June 1998 provide <strong>for</strong> the<br />

<strong>conditions</strong> <strong>and</strong> criteria <strong>for</strong> obta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g territorial <strong>asylum</strong>, which is granted at the discretion of the<br />

M<strong>in</strong>ister of Interior. The M<strong>in</strong>ister’s decisions are not reasoned.<br />

In case of a negative decision by the M<strong>in</strong>ister of Interior, applicants may either lodge a request <strong>for</strong><br />

adm<strong>in</strong>istrative review (“recours gracieux”) with the M<strong>in</strong>ister or, with<strong>in</strong> two months, appeal aga<strong>in</strong>st<br />

the decision to the Adm<strong>in</strong>istrative Court. Such an appeal, however, has no suspensive effect <strong>and</strong><br />

the procedure is very lengthy.<br />

Persons granted territorial <strong>asylum</strong> are issued with a one-year residence permit, which can be<br />

renewed twice <strong>for</strong> one year. The renewal may be refused if the circumstances that have justified<br />

the grant<strong>in</strong>g of the status have changed. After this three-year period, they may receive a<br />

permanent (ten years) residence permit. They are allowed to work <strong>and</strong> are granted the same<br />

status <strong>and</strong> <strong>social</strong> rights as migrant workers.<br />

In 1998, 1,339 applications <strong>for</strong> territorial <strong>asylum</strong> were submitted <strong>and</strong> 224 decisions made.<br />

Territorial <strong>asylum</strong> was granted <strong>in</strong> 8 cases only (3,6% of the decisions). From January to May<br />

84<br />

France

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!