11.01.2013 Views

legal and social conditions for asylum seekers and refugees in ...

legal and social conditions for asylum seekers and refugees in ...

legal and social conditions for asylum seekers and refugees in ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

compared with 1997. Out of these 2,484 persons, 1,970 were admitted <strong>in</strong>to the territory <strong>and</strong> given<br />

access to the normal determ<strong>in</strong>ation procedure. The admission rate was 79.3% <strong>in</strong> 1998 (72.3% <strong>in</strong><br />

1997, 52.9% <strong>in</strong> 1996).<br />

The average time spent by applicants <strong>in</strong> wait<strong>in</strong>g zones <strong>in</strong>creased from 2.9 days <strong>in</strong> 1997 to seven<br />

days <strong>in</strong> 1998, which can be expla<strong>in</strong>ed by the strong <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> the number of applications <strong>in</strong><br />

1988. The extension of the process<strong>in</strong>g time has led to a degradation of the <strong>conditions</strong> <strong>in</strong> wait<strong>in</strong>g<br />

zones, as their capacity is not sufficient to deal with an <strong>in</strong>creased number of applicants.<br />

No. of border applications* Admission Refusal<br />

1996 526 279 (52.9%) 247 (47.1%)<br />

1997 1,010 730 (72.3%) 280 (27.7 %)<br />

1998 2,484 1,970 (79.3%) 514 (20.7%)<br />

1999 approx. 4,000 not available not available<br />

* exclud<strong>in</strong>g children<br />

In 1998, 57 nationalities were represented among applicants held <strong>in</strong> wait<strong>in</strong>g zones. Africans<br />

amounted to 72% of the border applications registered at the border, the ma<strong>in</strong> countries of orig<strong>in</strong><br />

be<strong>in</strong>g Rw<strong>and</strong>a (628), the Democratic Republic of Congo (29), Congo (63) <strong>and</strong> Burundi (30).<br />

Applicants from these countries had, <strong>in</strong> general, a high admission rate, such as 97.5% <strong>for</strong><br />

Rw<strong>and</strong>a or 97% <strong>for</strong> Burundi.<br />

In 1998, 332 unaccompanied m<strong>in</strong>ors have been registered at the border as <strong>asylum</strong> <strong>seekers</strong>, out<br />

of whom about 220 have lodged an <strong>asylum</strong> application with OFPRA (the others have<br />

disappeared). The ma<strong>in</strong> countries of orig<strong>in</strong> of these m<strong>in</strong>ors were Rw<strong>and</strong>a, Sierra Leone, Sri<br />

Lanka <strong>and</strong> Nigeria.<br />

The Dubl<strong>in</strong> Convention<br />

When another EU state is deemed responsible <strong>for</strong> the exam<strong>in</strong>ation of the <strong>asylum</strong> application on<br />

the basis of the Dubl<strong>in</strong> Convention, the applicant is issued with a “Dubl<strong>in</strong> convocation”, which<br />

amounts to no more than protection aga<strong>in</strong>st refoulement. Asylum <strong>seekers</strong> with a “Dubl<strong>in</strong><br />

convocation” are refused accommodation <strong>in</strong> reception centres <strong>and</strong> are not granted any f<strong>in</strong>ancial<br />

assistance.<br />

If the state considered to be responsible, accepts to take charge, the <strong>asylum</strong> seeker is transferred<br />

to this country. Applicants may travel on their own or under escort. If the request <strong>for</strong> readmission<br />

is rejected, the applicant is transferred to the normal determ<strong>in</strong>ation procedure <strong>and</strong> his/her<br />

application processed by the French <strong>asylum</strong> authorities. From that moment, access to<br />

accommodation <strong>and</strong> <strong>social</strong> support is granted.<br />

From 1996 to 1998, the French authorities adopted a flexible approach to Articles 4 <strong>and</strong> 3.6 of the<br />

Schengen Convention <strong>and</strong> later Articles 3.4 <strong>and</strong> 9 of the Dubl<strong>in</strong> Convention, which provide <strong>for</strong><br />

derogation to the usual responsibility criteria <strong>for</strong> humanitarian reasons based <strong>in</strong> particular <strong>and</strong> on<br />

family <strong>and</strong> cultural grounds. This practice, however, was not confirmed <strong>in</strong> 1999.<br />

There is no specific appeal procedure aga<strong>in</strong>st the decisions of transfer made under the Dubl<strong>in</strong><br />

Convention. As any other adm<strong>in</strong>istrative decisions, they may be appealed to the Adm<strong>in</strong>istrative<br />

Courts, but without suspensive effect.<br />

Entry <strong>in</strong>to the territory<br />

If the M<strong>in</strong>istry of the Interior reaches a positive decision, the <strong>asylum</strong> seeker is admitted <strong>in</strong>to the<br />

territory <strong>and</strong> given a "safe conduct” pass. This is valid <strong>for</strong> eight days <strong>and</strong> allows him/her to apply<br />

<strong>for</strong> <strong>asylum</strong> with the Prefecture, which issues a provisional residence permit, valid <strong>for</strong> one month.<br />

87<br />

France

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!