13.01.2013 Views

SILVIJA GROSA JŪGENDSTILA PERIODA PLASTISKAIS UN ...

SILVIJA GROSA JŪGENDSTILA PERIODA PLASTISKAIS UN ...

SILVIJA GROSA JŪGENDSTILA PERIODA PLASTISKAIS UN ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

VIII. CONCLUSION<br />

The author of this dissertation has studied a wide range of factual<br />

materials which speak to the criteria that were used in selecting decorative motifs<br />

in the architecture of the turn of the 19 th and 20 th centuries. Thus she has expanded<br />

her knowledge about the architectonic and social prerequisites for the emergence<br />

of plastic and painted décor in architecture during that period, as well as about the<br />

sources of inspiration for such décor. The comparative and analogous materials<br />

make it possible to determine the regional specifics of décor. The author has<br />

managed to supplement information about those who produced architectural décor<br />

in Rīga during the relevant period of time. The dissertation offers analysis of Art<br />

Nouveau as a paradigm of the processes of the arts at the turn of the centuries, also<br />

considering the issue of the genesis of Art Nouveau in Rīga. There is also offered<br />

a more precise evaluation of the relationship between Art Nouveau and other<br />

styles, including the traditions of Historicism, National Romanticism, Domestic<br />

Revival and Neo-Classicism. The research makes possible the following general<br />

conclusions:<br />

• At the turn of the 19 th and 20 th centuries, the specific situation in<br />

Rīga, as opposed to many other large cities at that time, was created by the fact that<br />

it was part of the Russian Empire and of the relevant zone of interests. There were<br />

also tensions related to nationalism which resulted to the traditional privileges<br />

which Baltic Germans enjoyed in Latvia. The early 20 th century, however, was<br />

also a period in which Latvian national culture began to flourish. The increased<br />

volume of construction in the last two years of the 19 th century and the search for<br />

uniqueness – this promoted a search for new decorative techniques. Around 1898,<br />

there was also a gradual approach toward Art Nouveau. Still, the active<br />

construction of multi-story stone buildings harmonised the overall visual<br />

appearance of the city only gradually. In some streets, this was facilitated by the<br />

fact that a single architect designed more than one building, but it was also<br />

promoted, in part, by the further development of decorative motifs.<br />

• One specific aspect of architecture in Rīga during the relevant period<br />

of time is a high level of overall professionalism, but the development of<br />

architecture here was not dictated by one or several leaders. There was the element<br />

of traditionalism, which denigrated the situation somewhat because of increased<br />

interest in the so-called Domestic Revival. Initially, and perhaps because of artistic<br />

inertia, there was a focus on classical motifs and a regional approach to Classicism<br />

– so-called Burgher Classicism. This appeared in building décor around the turn of<br />

the century and became particularly active during the late period of Art Nouveau,<br />

around the year 1907. The avoidance of radical solutions was particularly evident<br />

in the architecture of public buildings, as well as in the buildings owned privately<br />

by architects, where there was no conflict of interest between the client and the<br />

designer.<br />

101

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!