20.01.2013 Views

The Impact of Energy Use on Poor Urban Livelihoods in ... - DfID

The Impact of Energy Use on Poor Urban Livelihoods in ... - DfID

The Impact of Energy Use on Poor Urban Livelihoods in ... - DfID

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

A Study <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the <str<strong>on</strong>g>Impact</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Energy</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>on</strong> <strong>Poor</strong> <strong>Urban</strong> <strong>Livelihoods</strong> <strong>in</strong> Arusha, Tanzania<br />

weak energy <strong>in</strong>frastructure and this results <strong>in</strong> the limited use <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> modern fuels for most<br />

urban energy needs. He cites three ma<strong>in</strong> reas<strong>on</strong>s for the heavy reliance <strong>on</strong> traditi<strong>on</strong>al<br />

fuels for urban energy needs: (i) low <strong>in</strong>come levels; (ii) the limited nature <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> energy<br />

<strong>in</strong>frastructure and (iii) erratic supplies <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> modern fuels.<br />

Figure C.10: Proporti<strong>on</strong>al use by type <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> energy <strong>in</strong> domestic<br />

energy sector<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>Energy</str<strong>on</strong>g> Source Ma<strong>in</strong>land<br />

Tanzania<br />

Light<strong>in</strong>g<br />

<strong>Urban</strong> Areas (except<br />

Dar-es-Salaam)<br />

91/92 00/01 91/92 00/01<br />

Electricity 6.6 9.2 20.7 28.6<br />

Solar <str<strong>on</strong>g>Energy</str<strong>on</strong>g> N/A 0.6 N/A 0.5<br />

Gas 0.5 0.2 0.6 0.1<br />

Kerosene 89.8 83.9 78.7 69.6<br />

Candles 0.0 0.4 0.0 0.3<br />

Firewood &<br />

other<br />

3.1 5.7 0.0 0.7<br />

100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00<br />

Total<br />

Cook<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Electricity 1.5 0.9 4.8 2.4<br />

Solar <str<strong>on</strong>g>Energy</str<strong>on</strong>g> N/A 0.9 N/A 0.8<br />

Gas-<strong>in</strong>dustrial 0.2 0.3 0.6 0.1<br />

Gas-biogas N/A 0.1 N/A 0.1<br />

Kerosene 5.2 5.0 13.3 8.9<br />

Coal 0.2 0.1 0.3 0.3<br />

Charcoal 10.6 14.2 36.6 53.3<br />

Firewood 81.5 78.5 43.4 33.8<br />

Other 0.8 0.1 1.0 0.2<br />

100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00<br />

Total<br />

Source: HBS 2000/01<br />

Household energy surveys (Hosier and Kip<strong>on</strong>dya:1993) 57 revealed that:<br />

• household energy c<strong>on</strong>sumpti<strong>on</strong> resp<strong>on</strong>ds to price and local availability<br />

• charcoal is the dom<strong>in</strong>ant household fuel<br />

• <strong>in</strong> recent years households have begun mak<strong>in</strong>g greater use <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> electricity<br />

and kerosene because these fuels are sold at subsidised rates. This has<br />

led to resource misallocati<strong>on</strong>s at the nati<strong>on</strong>al level 58 but has been<br />

justified <strong>on</strong> the grounds that it will help the poor and alleviate pressure <strong>on</strong><br />

woodfuel resources.<br />

As shown <strong>in</strong> table 2.5 charcoal, firewood, kerosene and electricity are currently the<br />

major energy sources for urban areas. <str<strong>on</strong>g>The</str<strong>on</strong>g> dom<strong>in</strong>ant fuels be<strong>in</strong>g charcoal and<br />

57 C<strong>on</strong>ducted <strong>in</strong> 1990 <strong>in</strong> Dar-es-Salaam, Mbeya and Sh<strong>in</strong>yanga<br />

58 e.g. (i) cost <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> supply<strong>in</strong>g electricity is far greater than its c<strong>on</strong>sumer price; (ii) kerosene is cheaper than<br />

charcoal; (iii) LPG is the household fuel for which c<strong>on</strong>sumers pay closest to the ec<strong>on</strong>omic marg<strong>in</strong>al cost<br />

but there is poor uptake..<br />

Development Plann<strong>in</strong>g Unit, UCL L<strong>on</strong>d<strong>on</strong><br />

Dr. Sheilah Meikle and Patrice North

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!