28.01.2013 Views

DDK HistoryF.p65 - CSIR

DDK HistoryF.p65 - CSIR

DDK HistoryF.p65 - CSIR

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

9.5J INCREASING NUMBER OF OFFICIALS 321<br />

to a sixth of the produce. The powerful trade and rapid expansion of<br />

village settlements in Bengal are to be seen incidentally from such<br />

grants.<br />

Local tenure differed from place to place, and older usages were<br />

always respected as far as possible. In Fleet 80, a village was given<br />

away by consent of some assembly to temple priests, along with its<br />

inhabitants, who must have been some special class of sudras. This<br />

puzzling gift of the maharaja maha-samanta Samundrasena belongs to<br />

the 7th century Punjab; in other places, the people given away were<br />

conquered aborigines. But village workmen were sometimes “given”<br />

too (JBORS 2.423, 407, 415; EL IS.lff., 363). In some plates,<br />

individualplots are granted. As time went on, the grants<br />

became more and more generous. Yet one feature remained<br />

unchanged. The recipients of a whole village gained at most the rights<br />

the state would normally claim. That is, they collected the taxes already<br />

fixed by usage. No portions of the tax was to be passed on to the state<br />

or any state official, but the donee had not the right to increase such<br />

taxes, nor any property rights over land and cattle. The Arthasastra<br />

theory of state ownership of land survived, but meant primarily that<br />

the state would claim taxes on cultivated land, in which settler’s rights<br />

were guaranteed on the whole. Again, caste was responsible for limiting<br />

oppression of the cultivator to a certain extent. His fellow-castemen,<br />

originally descended from the same tribe, would stand by him, if it came<br />

to the worst; such a local jati would normally extend beyond a single<br />

village. In the Harsacarita and the successive Damodarpur plates,<br />

the development of more and more high officials is to be noted :<br />

feudalism from above tended to become heavier with time.<br />

The following extract from a land grant of Harsa in the 25th<br />

year (of his reign) illustrates a general process :<br />

“From the great royal camp-headquarters, provided with boats, elephants, horses<br />

and (accompanied by) victory, .at (the village of) Kapitthika. Har§a, the devotee of<br />

Mahesvara, issues this command to the feudatories and officials (mahasamantas,<br />

maharajas, dauhsodhya-sadhanikas pramataras, rajasthaniyas, kumaramatyas,<br />

uparikas, visayapatis, regular and auxiliary soldiers, state servants and others) assembled<br />

at the village of Somaguflftla, which belongs to the Kuaritfadhani visaya in the Sravasti<br />

bhukti; and to the people JH-21

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!