28.01.2013 Views

DDK HistoryF.p65 - CSIR

DDK HistoryF.p65 - CSIR

DDK HistoryF.p65 - CSIR

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

NOTES TO CHAPTER II 51<br />

castes many generations ago; but such possibilities become rarer every year. The<br />

tribesman has now to join the agricultural proletariat as an individual.<br />

3. Dendrochronography is the measurement of sequences in tree-rings, from<br />

wood in different monuments. White ants and the climate make this difficult in India.<br />

Carbon 14 technique is useful, though less accurate, and made rather difficult by air<br />

contaminated because of atomic explosions for * experimental’ purposes.<br />

4. Henri Frankfort : Studies in the early pottery of the near East {R. Anthr. Inst,<br />

London, occasional papers 6 (1925), 8 (1927)] established the still accepted pottery,<br />

index for Mesopotamia. R.E.M. Wheeler made it possible by excavations at<br />

Arikametfu in 1945 to extend the method to India, by noting Arretine (Italic) pottery<br />

in Indian strata. For Meso-potamian archaeology, cf. Seton Lloyd : Foundations in<br />

the dust (Pelican Books A 336). Excavations at Jarmo and Melefaat collated with the<br />

most archaic Hassuna pottery establish the sequence from a pre-pottery stage to the<br />

literate urban cultures of Mesopotamia.<br />

5. A good survey is to be seen in the Indian Government publication : Archaeology<br />

in India (1950) and Al 9. Special articles in Ancient India (of which the^ first 11<br />

numbers were available at the time of writing) are also valuable, as being written from<br />

the modern point of view. F. R. Allchin’s note (Trans. All-India Oriental Conference,<br />

1955) Neolithic culture in India : a resurvey of evidence summarizes most of the<br />

available information. My gratitude is expressed here for stimulating discussions with<br />

Dr. and Mrs. Allchin, who also verified my finds of stone-age tools and corrected the<br />

old-fashioned terminology.<br />

6. Cf. Khwaja Muhammad Ahmad, Preliminary excavations at prehistoric sites<br />

near Janampet; an undated, perfunctory report. A great deal of unsystematic work<br />

conducted under the auspices of various colleges and universities is as deplorable.<br />

Any reader who rushes to do his own digging should first study L. Woolley’s Digging<br />

up the past (Pelican A 4) and Wheeler’s Archaeology from the earth (Pelican A 356),<br />

which has special value for Indian excavations. The only caution to add is that<br />

current Indian technique (e.g. pottery) must also be studied.<br />

7. Best described in H. de Terra & T. T. Paterson : Studies in the Ice age in<br />

India and associated human cultures^ which surveys the oldest sites.<br />

8. The one I know best was on a farm owned in 1931 by one Mclsaacs, on the<br />

road from Bangalore to Magatfi.<br />

9. My informant, Dr. C. V. Najarajan, pointed out the actual boulder, but I have<br />

not explored the cave, nor found it described anywhere.<br />

10. This alone would suffice to dispose of Freud’s theory of Totem and Tabu,<br />

which seems quite arbitrary from the ethnographer’s point of view. It was shown by<br />

B. Malinowski in his Dynamics of cultural change that the Oedipus complex and<br />

corresponding “incest motives” are replaced by others in a matrilineal or matrilocal

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!