Left-Extremist Endeavours
Left-Extremist Endeavours
Left-Extremist Endeavours
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Failure to forge a first link<br />
with the "left wing"<br />
transformed into a right-extremist theoretician - MAHLER published<br />
a "Canonical Declaration on the Movement of 1968" in<br />
"Staatsbriefe". In that Declaration, the authors wished to make<br />
clear that this political movement had risen neither for the Eastern<br />
nor for the Western community of shared values, but had<br />
stood up for the right of every people to national-revolutionary<br />
and social-revolutionary self-liberation. The German "Sixty-Eight"<br />
had, after National-Socialism, been the second attempt at a<br />
revolution against the world rule of capital 82) . With their "Canonical<br />
Declaration", the signatories intended to re-interpret the<br />
1968 Movement in a national-revolutionary sense in order to<br />
mobilize former supporters of the "New <strong>Left</strong>" of that time for a<br />
swing to the "right". However, this suggestion, strange and unreasonable<br />
as it appeared, met with fierce objection. 83) .<br />
Against this background, defeat must be assumed also as regards<br />
the hope formulated by other right-extremist intellectuals<br />
"to forge a first link with the left-wing" - as put forward by Jürgen<br />
SCHWAB in the NPD organ "Deutsche Stimme" and in the<br />
magazine "Signal" - as an opening in terms of a policy of alliances<br />
and ideology 84) . While right and left-wing extremists have<br />
a number of common interests in terms of content and structure<br />
85) as regards rejection of the democratic constitutional state, it<br />
may be assumed that the strong political reservations of "leftwingers"<br />
will also in future prevent a rapprochement between the<br />
two camps.<br />
Demarcation Also, there was no further erosion of the demarcation between<br />
democratic-conservative and right-extremist journalists/publicists.<br />
Over the past years, the process of blurring of that demarcation<br />
was credited as a partial success to right-extremist intellectuals.<br />
Only a very small number of democratic-conservative politicians,<br />
journalists and scholars appeared as authors in right-extremist<br />
publication organs and anthologies or included authors of the<br />
right-extremist camp in their concepts for anthologies. There are<br />
relatively few conservatives ready to engage in such cooperation.<br />
"Junge Freiheit"<br />
In this context, appraisal of the weekly "Junge Freiheit" ("Young<br />
Freedom") is problematic. In addition to democratic-conservative<br />
authors, also right-wing extremists are provided with a forum in<br />
the form of articles, interviews and commentaries. In "Junge<br />
Freiheit", Alain de BENOIST - listed as a permanent staff member<br />
in the weekly's masthead, and who is regarded as the "chief ideologist"<br />
of the French "New Right" - expressed his rejection of<br />
democratic constitutional states: he would prefer a nationalcommunist<br />
regime to a Western-liberal system at any time 86) .<br />
����