JOURNALfor the STUDYof ANTISEMITISM
JOURNALfor the STUDYof ANTISEMITISM
JOURNALfor the STUDYof ANTISEMITISM
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
34 JOURNAL FOR THE STUDY OF <strong>ANTISEMITISM</strong> [ VOL. 3:27<br />
negative editorials, cartoons, and letters—that is, few negative news regarding<br />
Jews and/or Israel have a significant, and disproportional, impact on<br />
Mexican public opinion.<br />
Regarding <strong>the</strong> contents of <strong>the</strong> media discourse, 2010 has shown both a<br />
continuation of previous patterns as well as changing trends. Zionism,<br />
which, as stated, has been identified with racism, colonialism, and imperialism,<br />
became an incorporated and implicit argument of <strong>the</strong> major focus—<br />
i.e., <strong>the</strong> State of Israel portrayed as a belligerent and war-prone state,<br />
oppressive and genocidal. The axis of human rights violation has gained an<br />
increased presence among <strong>the</strong> critical arguments; <strong>the</strong> Arab-Israeli conflict<br />
continued to be portrayed as part of <strong>the</strong> clash between <strong>the</strong> imperialist West<br />
and <strong>the</strong> Arab and Muslim Third World.<br />
Editorials published in <strong>the</strong> Mexican press in 2010 put emphasis on<br />
Israel’s conduction of “war crimes” in Lebanon and Gaza; Israel’s “terrorist”<br />
traits, and its implementation of “massacre,” “genocide,” and “collective<br />
punishment” in Gaza to a million and a half Palestinians; <strong>the</strong> building<br />
of a wall in <strong>the</strong> West Bank that seeks to “exterminate” 4.5 million Palestinians;<br />
Israel’s “violation” of international law in <strong>the</strong> occupied territories and<br />
worldwide; <strong>the</strong> Zionist Jewish state as a racist one on nationality and citizenship<br />
issues; and Israel as an “apar<strong>the</strong>id” state. 15<br />
Prejudice also may be found or revealed by omission of relevant information<br />
that could show Israel’s perspective as an actor/active player. While<br />
this omission differs from explicit prejudice association, it also has a meaningful<br />
impact.<br />
Insofar as <strong>the</strong> State of Israel became <strong>the</strong> main focus of <strong>the</strong> arguments,<br />
<strong>the</strong> fluid interconnections established between anti-Israelism and historical<br />
antisemitism, ra<strong>the</strong>r than between anti-Israelism and dilution of <strong>the</strong> Holocaust,<br />
became <strong>the</strong> radicalized point of departure of <strong>the</strong> dispute.<br />
To exemplify fluid interconnections of meanings, we may point to <strong>the</strong><br />
overlapping of anti-Israelism/<strong>the</strong> Holocaust through analogies, parallels,<br />
15. Andres Pascoe Pierce, “La década del terror” (A Decade of Terror), Crónica,<br />
January 2, 2010; Xavier Caño Tamayo, “Sobre una bomba de violaciones de<br />
derechos humanos” (About a human rights violations bomb), Rumbo de México,<br />
January 4, 2010; José Steinsleger, “¿Cuándo caerá el muro?” (When will <strong>the</strong> wall<br />
fall?), La Jornada. January 6, 2010; Héctor Delgado, “ONU monosabia, ignora la<br />
autodeterminación” (Mono-wise United Nations ignores self-determination), Uno<br />
más uno, February 11, 2010; Manu Dorberier (newspaper editorial), “El que se<br />
somete a la infamia, se convierte en infame” (He who puts himself under infamy<br />
becomes infamous), El Sol de México, February 20, 2010; “Lula en Israel” (Lula in<br />
Israel), La Jornada, March 16, 2010; José Steinsleger, “¿Israelíes o judíos?” (Israelis<br />
or Jews?), La Jornada, April 21, 2010; Juan Gelman, “Prohibido y ya” (Forbidden,<br />
that’s it), Milenio Diario, May 29, 2010.