01.02.2013 Views

JOURNALfor the STUDYof ANTISEMITISM

JOURNALfor the STUDYof ANTISEMITISM

JOURNALfor the STUDYof ANTISEMITISM

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

80 JOURNAL FOR THE STUDY OF <strong>ANTISEMITISM</strong> [ VOL. 3:71<br />

are <strong>the</strong> representation of all <strong>the</strong> bad things of modernity—e.g., colonialism,<br />

imperialism, racism, Nazism—that haunt <strong>the</strong> progressive fantasy.<br />

But not all <strong>the</strong> criticism of Israel should be considered part of <strong>the</strong> new<br />

Judeophobia. We must avoid falling into a position equivalent to <strong>the</strong> intellectuals<br />

here, criticizing and trivializing <strong>the</strong> antisemitic concept. We must<br />

avoid using criticism flippantly because, in <strong>the</strong> long run, this category loses<br />

its effectiveness to account for real-life situations. If you are using <strong>the</strong><br />

antisemitic concept as a tool to avoid any criticism, it becomes meaningless<br />

in that if everything is antisemitism, <strong>the</strong>n nothing is.<br />

In certain hard-core attacks, <strong>the</strong>re is a tendency to label antisemitic<br />

criticism as anti-Israeli, but not all is. There are certain conditions that must<br />

be met for a valid criticism to become an open declaration of prejudice.<br />

Several authors raise <strong>the</strong>se conditions that help us to draw <strong>the</strong> boundaries<br />

between <strong>the</strong> two. We must weigh each statement carefully to avoid falling<br />

into banal generalizations that render both as equally critical.<br />

To avoid <strong>the</strong>se counterproductive accusations, we should establish<br />

clearly that Jew phobias, whatever <strong>the</strong>ir origin, have common qualitative<br />

elements that can syn<strong>the</strong>size a number of characteristics that define,<br />

namely:<br />

a) The “objective” nature: The Judeophobe will always find an excuse<br />

to make a hatred appear objective (detach from it and live it not as<br />

himself but as something objective—i.e., a bad thing in Jews that<br />

legitimizes <strong>the</strong> bitterness toward <strong>the</strong>m). It is a mental process that<br />

sits <strong>the</strong> quality of <strong>the</strong> hatred in <strong>the</strong> hated object, leading to hatred is<br />

experienced as something generated by <strong>the</strong> object of hatred (“The<br />

Jew” “El Zionism” “Israel”) because of some objective fact—e.g.,<br />

<strong>the</strong> Deicide, <strong>the</strong> desecration of <strong>the</strong> body of Christ, <strong>the</strong> global domination<br />

conspiracy, <strong>the</strong> cosmopolitan betrayal, racial pollution, Palestinian<br />

genocide.<br />

b) The unconscious character: Rarely and only in extreme cases does<br />

Jew phobia appear as a conscious element. It will generally form as<br />

hidden (repressed) consciousness and discomfort that generates as<br />

an unconscious manifestation; as such, it competes to emerge in<br />

consciousness through “flashes” that will assume an increasingly<br />

violent nature and become increasingly difficult to suppress.<br />

c) Suffering: A characteristic of <strong>the</strong> presence of Jew phobia is <strong>the</strong><br />

compulsive obsession with those who suffer. The Jewish problem,<br />

e.g., an obsession with Israel, grows to occupy all space with its<br />

reasoning; <strong>the</strong>re are only anti-Israel demonstrations, and solidarity<br />

is not motivated to confront tremendous humanitarian tragedies.<br />

d) The obsessiveness: It follows from <strong>the</strong> above that Jew phobia

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!