27.07.2013 Views

MINNE OCH MANIPULATION - Centre for European Studies - Lunds ...

MINNE OCH MANIPULATION - Centre for European Studies - Lunds ...

MINNE OCH MANIPULATION - Centre for European Studies - Lunds ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

102<br />

I don’t know if we need a group psycho-analysis of the nation. In all cases we need<br />

gaining knowledge of ourselves, inner exploration and national self-identification.<br />

Demythologization is also needed, and a new determination, too. And most<br />

important, we need a new enlightening/public awareness campaign based on truth<br />

that will help the true face of our race to emerge again beneath the make-up.<br />

It is a known fact that the strong, overt commitment to – and even obsession with -<br />

history is specific <strong>for</strong> the Balkans. The roots of this commitment are to be found<br />

not only in the tragic and tangled history of the region itself. I believe this<br />

phenomenon can also be explained by specific “contaminations” of the modern<br />

historiography of the Balkan nations. The widely popular, fully accepted and<br />

persistently revived heroic memories, romantic interpretations and ideological<br />

(mis)use of history - mainly <strong>for</strong> the assertion and promotion of national pride – are<br />

common features in Greece, Serbia and Bulgaria, not to mention young<br />

Macedonia. History is the main building material in the <strong>for</strong>mation of national<br />

cultural identity. Public knowledge of history has not yet reached the level of an<br />

objective, unbiased and fair analysis of the ups and downs in national history. Both<br />

state and political institutions exploit history and subject it to their own agenda.<br />

Social inertia, cultural stereotypes and the passive (or indifferent) attitude of<br />

intellectuals, who “fathered” all this, provide convenient background <strong>for</strong> both<br />

authors and “users” of history.<br />

Demythologization, including the revealing of historical deception, is the first<br />

step to the new national self-determination that N. Dimu speaks of.<br />

The Scandal<br />

In 2007 a notorious public scandal arose around the international project entitled<br />

“Batak as a Realm of Memory”. It turned an academic project into a political and<br />

even a physical clash. The project concerned the epochal Bulgarian uprising in the<br />

village of Batak against the Ottomans in 1876 26 . Although the planned conference<br />

26 The story is the following: In April 1876 in certain parts in Bulgaria there was an insurrection<br />

against the Ottoman Empire which ended with a massacre in the village of Batak with around 1500<br />

victims. The slaughter of an unarmed civilian population which had sought refuge in the local church<br />

became one of the most important “realms of memory” <strong>for</strong> Bulgarian national history <strong>for</strong> the entire<br />

Ottoman period. The news about the massacre and the incorrect number of 5000 (in some accounts<br />

even 7000) victims was first spread by the American journalist MacGhahan. Then the story about<br />

Batak was retold in the famous “Notes of Bulgarian Uprising” by Zachary Stoianov, and finally the<br />

poet Ivan Vazov sealed the national memory about the devastated village. Since the end of the 19th<br />

century Batak has become the most sacred lieu de memoire of the Bulgarian national pantheon, and<br />

the church in the village was turned into a museum, where almost every Bulgarian child is taken as a<br />

part of mandatory school study trips. Later on, the crypt of the church, where the sculls of the victims

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!