17.07.2013 Views

Type 2-diabetes - Sundhedsstyrelsen

Type 2-diabetes - Sundhedsstyrelsen

Type 2-diabetes - Sundhedsstyrelsen

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Conclusions<br />

Based on the Project Group’s work it is concluded that:<br />

General<br />

H <strong>Type</strong> 2 <strong>diabetes</strong> is presently a widespread disease that has considerable<br />

consequences for the patient, the health service and society. One in two<br />

patients suffer complications to the disease at the time the diagnosis is<br />

made. There is a latent period of several years between the time the disease<br />

arises and its clinical diagnosis. All these conditions speak in favour of<br />

screening for <strong>Type</strong> 2 <strong>diabetes</strong> (1b).<br />

Technology<br />

H Validated screening tests are available where the validity, sensitivity, specificity<br />

and predictive value are known. Most tests only entail minimal<br />

physical discomfort and should therefore be acceptable. All suffer from a<br />

high degree of both false negative and false positive test results, however,<br />

depending on what cutoffs are selected for the individual test (2b).<br />

H At present there are no studies that have systematically assessed a screening<br />

strategy based on case finding of individuals with a high risk of developing<br />

<strong>diabetes</strong> using questionnaires and subsequent analysis of non-fasting blood<br />

samples – an approach that would minimise the number of fasting blood<br />

samples and the number of glucose tolerance tests. Neither is there literature<br />

that has assessed the population’s reaction to these screening strategies.<br />

Such a study is ongoing in Denmark, and the results are expected during<br />

the course of 2004.<br />

H Finally, there are no simple screening methods with high sensitivity<br />

(90%) that concomitantly have an acceptable, high specificity (80%)<br />

(1b).<br />

H There is evidence that intensive medical treatment of raised blood glucose,<br />

raised blood pressure and dyslipidemia as well as lifestyle changes can<br />

improve the prognosis in patients with <strong>diabetes</strong> diagnosed on the basis of<br />

clinical symptoms (1a).<br />

H Extrapolation of results from studies encompassing these patients to patients<br />

identified by screening is not unproblematic as the former patients<br />

must be assumed to have more severe symptoms and a more serious disease<br />

state.<br />

H There is therefore a need for good documentation showing that screening<br />

and subsequent early intensive treatment of patients detected by screening<br />

reduce the risk of developing complications and reduce mortality, although<br />

this can be assumed to be the case based on epidemiological<br />

studies.<br />

The patient<br />

H Little has been reported about the ethical, psychological and psychosocial<br />

consequences of screening as specifically related to <strong>diabetes</strong>, and decisions<br />

about screening must therefore largely be based on extrapolation from<br />

experience with other disease categories.<br />

64 <strong>Type</strong> 2-<strong>diabetes</strong>. Medicinsk teknologivurdering af screening, diagnostik og behandling

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!