Genmanipulation - Zentrum der Gesundheit

Anmerkungen
1. ‘Open Letter from World Scientists to All Governments’ calling for a moratorium on
releases of GMOs and support for organic sustainable agriculture, now signed by
more than 600 scientists from 72 countries, with many references to the scientific
literature, www.i-sis.org.uk
2. Agriculture: Towards 2015/30. FAO Global Perspectives Studies Unit, July 2000.
3. Altieri MA and Rosset P. Ten reasons why biotechnology will not ensure food
security, protect the environment and reduce poverty in the developing world.
AgBioForum, Volume 2, Number 3 & 4, Summer/Fall 1999, 155-162.
4. Altieri MA and Rosset P. Strengthening the case for why biotechnology will not help
the developing world: A response to McGloughlin. AgBioForum, Volume 2, Number 3
& 4, Summer/Fall 1999, 226-236.
5. ActionAid. GM Crops - Going Against the Grain. 2003.
http://www.actionaid.org/resources/pdfs/gatg.pdf
6. http://www.isaaa.org
7. Pimbert M, Wakeford T and Satheesh PV. Citizens' juries on GMOs and farming
futures in India. LEISA Magazine, December 2001, 27-30. http://www.ileia.org/2/17-
4/27-30.PDF
8. Pimbert MP and Wakeford T. Prajateerpu: A Citizens Jury/Scenario Workshop on
Food and Farming Futures for Andhra Pradesh, India. IIED & IDS, 2002,
http://www.iied.org/pdf/Prajateerpu.pdf
9. Ho MW and Lim LC. Biotech debacle in four parts. Special briefing for the Prime
Minister's Strategy Unit on GM. ISIS Report, August 2002, www.i-sis.org.uk
10. Ho MW. The state of the art. The continuing debacle of an industry both financially
and scientifically bankrupt. GeneWatch (in press), 2003.
11. ”Monsanto investors face catastrophic risk,” Greenpeace, Berlin, Press Release,
16 April, 2003.
12. Benbrook CM. Evidence of the magnitude and consequences of the Roundup
Ready soybean yield drag from university-based varietal trials in 1998. AgBioTech
InfoNet Technical Paper Number 1, 1999; Troubled times amid commercial success:
Glyphosate efficacy in slipping and unstable transgenic expression erodes plant
defences and yields. AgBioTech InfoNet Technical Paper Number 4, 1999,
www.biotech-info-net/RR_yield_less.html
13. Benbrook C. Do GM crops mean less pesticide use? Pesticide Outlook, October
2001.
14. Lim LC and Matthews J. GM crops failed on every count. Science in Society 2002,
13/14, 31-33; fully referenced version on ISIS members' website, www.i-sis.org.uk
15. Seeds of doubt, North American farmers’ experiences of GM crops. Soil
Association, 2002, ISBN 0 905200 89 6.
16. Shiva V and Jafri AH. Failure of the GMOs in India. Research Foundation for
Science, Technology and Ecology Report, 2003; see also Ho MW. Living with the Fluid
Genome. ISIS & TWN, London and Penang, 2003. Chapter 1, Box 1.
17. Finnegan H and McElroy D. Transgene inactivation: plants fight back!
Bio/Technology 1994, 12, 883-8.
18. Ho MW. Living with the Fluid Genome. ISIS & TWN, London and Penang, 2003.
Chapter 11, Section, ”Transgenic instability, the best kept open secret”.
19. Ho MW, Cummins J. and Ryan A. ISIS Reprints on Transgenic Instability 1999-
2002, ISIS members' website, www.i-sis.org.uk
20. Gahakwa D, Maqbool SB, Fu X, Sudhakar D, Christou P and Kohli A. Transgenic
rice as a system to study the stability of transgene expression: multiple heterologous
91