27.02.2013 Views

Wind Energy

Wind Energy

Wind Energy

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

26 Network Perspective of <strong>Wind</strong>-Power Production 151<br />

extension to include link removals and link capacities, the main conclusions<br />

from before are confirmed. These are important findings for critical infrastructures<br />

like communication networks and power grids.<br />

26.3 Two <strong>Wind</strong>-Power Related Model Extensions<br />

The critical infrastructure network model of Sect. 26.2 can be extended in<br />

many directions. The picture we have in mind for the first generalization is<br />

that of a grid consisting of only volatile wind-powered sources. A simple, but<br />

adequate model extension is to replace the path strengths sif in (26.1) by<br />

random (source) node strengths si, which are independently and identically<br />

drawn from for example a log-normal distribution<br />

�<br />

1<br />

p(s) = √ exp −<br />

2πσ2s (ln s + σ2 /2) 2<br />

2σ2 �<br />

(26.7)<br />

with fluctuation strength σ. Due to the conserved mean 〈s〉 = 1, the average<br />

load 〈Ln〉 of a node is independent of the fluctuation strength; consult again<br />

(26.1). A capacity layout Cn =(1+α)〈Ln〉 based on these averaged loads<br />

is not able to prevent the occasional overloading of nodes due to the source<br />

fluctuations. As a function of the fluctuation strength and for various tolerance<br />

parameters, Fig. 26.3a illustrates the relative size of the giant component<br />

resulting from a fluctuation-driven cascading overload failure within an initial<br />

N gc /N<br />

(a) (b)<br />

1 1<br />

0.95<br />

0.9<br />

0.8<br />

0.9<br />

0.7<br />

0.85<br />

0.6<br />

0.8<br />

0.5<br />

0.75<br />

0.4<br />

0.3<br />

0.7<br />

0.2<br />

0.65<br />

0 0.6368 0.8326 0.9572 1.0481 1.1193 1.1774<br />

0.1<br />

0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1<br />

Fluctuation strength Source strength<br />

Fig. 26.3. The relative size of the giant network component as a function of<br />

(a) the fluctuation strength σ of (26.7) and (b) the source strength swind of (26.8).<br />

All curves are based on the hop metric. From bottom to top the solid curves correspond<br />

to tolerance parameters α =0.1 (a),0.0 (b),0.2, 0.5, 1.0 andthedotted<br />

one to the (N − 1) analysis (26.2). For (a) all curves have been averaged over 50<br />

independent source realizations. One Poisson network realization with degree distribution<br />

pk =(λ k /k!)e −λ has been employed; parameters are N = 100 (a), 200 (b)<br />

and λ = 〈k〉 = 5 (a), 7 (b)<br />

N gc /N

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!