27.02.2013 Views

Wind Energy

Wind Energy

Wind Energy

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

64 Stefan Emeis and Matthias Türk<br />

are matched. For the logarithmic profiles a roughness length of 0.0001 m has<br />

been assumed. For neutral stratification no fit of the logarithmic profile to the<br />

measured data was possible because this profile is fixed through the inevitable<br />

choice L∗ = ∞ for the Monin–Obukhov length.<br />

The fits are satisfying over the whole height range only for stable stratification.<br />

The logarithmic profile from (11.1) is closer to the measurements<br />

than the power law profile from (11.2). For neutral conditions and unstable<br />

conditions below 50 m the fits are not so well. The measured profile for neutral<br />

conditions below 81 m is more slanted to the right than the truly neutral<br />

logarithmic profile indicating that we are already in the upper part of the<br />

surface layer. Above 81 m the measured wind speeds under neutral and stable<br />

conditions increase slower with height. Obviously, we reach here already<br />

the Ekman layer. Under unstable stratification the surface layer is higher and<br />

thus no drop in the wind speed increase with height can be observed below<br />

102.5 m.<br />

11.4 Conclusions<br />

Within the height range of their validity (i.e. the surface layer of the atmospheric<br />

boundary layer) a power law wind profile can only approximate<br />

a logarithmic wind profile over a wider height range in case of stable thermal<br />

stratification for certain surface roughnesses (see (11.3)). For neutral and<br />

unstable stratification this approximation is possible only for very smooth<br />

surfaces.<br />

There is an indication that for neutral and stable thermal stratification of<br />

the air offshore wind profiles in heights above about 80 m above the sea are<br />

already above the surface layer within which (11.1) is valid. Nevertheless a<br />

description of offshore profiles by (11.1) and (11.2) seem to be possible at least<br />

under stable conditions. But it remains open whether the Monin–Obukhov<br />

length L∗ used here to fit the logarithmic profile in 51 to 61 m height to the<br />

measured profile resembles to L∗ in the true surface layer in the first ten or<br />

twenty meters above the sea surface.<br />

References<br />

1. Stull RB (1988) An Introduction to Boundary Layer Meteorology. Kluwer,<br />

Dordrecht, pp. 666<br />

2. Sedefian L (1980) On the vertical extrapolation of mean wind power density.<br />

J Appl Meteorol 19:488–493<br />

3. Emeis S (2005) How Well Does a Power Law Fit to a Diabatic Boundary-Layer<br />

<strong>Wind</strong> Profile? DEWI Magazine 26:59–62

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!