27.02.2013 Views

Wind Energy

Wind Energy

Wind Energy

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

202 W. Geissler et al.<br />

as well as experimental tools. From this knowledge base together with former<br />

investigations on this subject possibilities are explored to favourably control<br />

Dynamic Stall.<br />

Figure 36.3 displays lift, drag and pitching moment hysteresis loops as<br />

measured from integrated signals of 45 miniature pressure sensors arranged<br />

at mid-span of the blade model. In the plots the force and moment data of<br />

all measured 160 consecutive cycles are simply plotted on top of each other.<br />

Two sets of data are included:<br />

1. Measurements with straight wind tunnel walls (grey curves)<br />

2. Measurements with steady wind tunnel wall adaptation at mean incidence<br />

(black curves).<br />

It is observed that a shift of the lift curve (left upper Fig. 36.3) occurs<br />

due to wind tunnel wall interference effects. The results with wind tunnel<br />

wall correction do better fit to the numerical curves indicated in the plots<br />

as well (dashed curves).<br />

2<br />

CL 1.5<br />

1<br />

0.5<br />

0<br />

0.2<br />

CM 0.1<br />

0.8<br />

CD<br />

−0.5<br />

−0.2<br />

0 5 10 15 20 0 5 10 15 20<br />

α<br />

α<br />

0<br />

−0.1<br />

−0.2<br />

−0.3<br />

−0.4<br />

0.6<br />

0.4<br />

0.2<br />

−0.5<br />

0 5 10 15 20<br />

α<br />

0<br />

straight WT−walls<br />

Adaptation at αmean Calculation: Free Transition<br />

Fig. 36.3. Lift-, drag- and pitching moment hysteresis loops; comparisons of calculation<br />

and measurement; M =0.31, α =9.8 ◦ ± 9.1 ◦ ,k =0.05

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!