26.03.2013 Views

Download Here - Islamic Books, Islamic Movies, Islamic Audio, All ...

Download Here - Islamic Books, Islamic Movies, Islamic Audio, All ...

Download Here - Islamic Books, Islamic Movies, Islamic Audio, All ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Page 127 of 215<br />

Ghaemiyeh center of computerized researches www.Ghaemiyeh.com<br />

ABU TALIB The faithful of Quraysh<br />

without paying any attention to his traditions?[360] But he might be Ishaq bin Ibraheem<br />

ad-Dubri, the companion of Abdur Razaq about whom ath-Thahabi said: He was not a<br />

man of traditions until he said: but Abdur Razaq narrated from him denied<br />

traditions. Then they were treated with hesitation; were they narrated by him alone or<br />

they were known traditions narrated by Abdur Razaq alone?[361] But the author of<br />

Sheikhul Abtah said when talking about this tradition that he was Ishaq bin Ibraheem bin<br />

Rahwayh.[362] Ath-Thahabi said about this one: Abu Obeid al-Aajuri said: I heard Abu<br />

Dawood saying: Ishaq bin Rahwayh became different (dotard) five months before his<br />

death. I heard from him some traditions at those days but I brushed them aside until he<br />

said: A tradition was mentioned to our sheikh Abul Hajjaj. He said: It was said that<br />

Ishaq doted at the last days of his life. Then he mentioned, as he thought, some of<br />

Ishaqs denied traditions.[363] We thought that he was the companion of Abdur Razaq<br />

because he related the tradition to Abdur Razaq. Then who was this Abdur Razaq? Was<br />

he Abdur Razaq bin Omar ath-Thaqafi, about whom it was said that he was weak,<br />

unreliable and his traditions were denied and about whom ad-Darqutni said that he was<br />

weak and his book was lost and Abu Mussahhar said from az-Zuhri that his book was<br />

lost?[364] But he might be that one, about whom ath-Thahabi had said in his tradition from<br />

Ishaq bin Ibraheem, which we mentioned above: but he narrated from Abdur Razaq<br />

denied traditionsetc. He had narrated from Mamar bin Rashid ten thousand<br />

traditions![365] Then we found among the narrators the name of Mamar. He was not<br />

but a liar, unknown and a narrator of denied traditions.[366] We thought that this Mamar<br />

was Mamar bin Rashid.[367] Ath-Thahabi said about him: He had famous illusions. Abu<br />

Hatim said. He didnt narrate traditions in Basra because he had many mistakes.[368]<br />

Abdur Razaq, who was one of the series of narrators of this tradition, said that he had<br />

written down from Mamar ten thousand traditions.[369] Did you see the great number<br />

of traditions?! And did you see this naughty series of narrators? There was nothing except<br />

.falseness, fabrication and split ties<br />

Also we found in the series of narrators of the second tradition incomplete and unknown<br />

names. Who was Abul Yaman? We didnt find save one name that narrated a mursal<br />

tradition (a tradition narrated without-or with incomplete or unknown-series of<br />

narrators).[370] The second name was Shuayb. We found many persons having this<br />

2

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!