WfHC - cover page (not to be used with pre-printed report ... - CSIRO
WfHC - cover page (not to be used with pre-printed report ... - CSIRO
WfHC - cover page (not to be used with pre-printed report ... - CSIRO
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
5 WORKING KNOWLEDGE: CONCLUSIONS AND<br />
RECOMMENDATIONS<br />
5.1 Introduction<br />
For the people of Kowanyama, and for the Oriners Mob in particular, Oriners is a special<br />
place. Its distance from Kowanyama makes travelling <strong>to</strong>, living and working there logistically<br />
difficult and expensive, even in the dry season when vehicle access is possible. In the wet<br />
season, the impassable Mitchell River and the unique „flooded forest‟ terrain make air travel,<br />
which is vastly more expensive, the main modern option <strong>to</strong> get in and out. However,<br />
traditional s<strong>to</strong>ry lines <strong>used</strong> <strong>to</strong> navigate the forest country, water bodies and ridgelines during<br />
the wet and dry season were designed for walking, and in the time when many Indigenous<br />
families were settled at Koolatah, walking back <strong>to</strong> the Oriners area was still common (Strang<br />
2001). While walking in<strong>to</strong> and out of Oriners is still practical and possible, this has <strong>be</strong>come<br />
much less common in recent times, and travel by horse is similarly unusual. The most<br />
practicable modern solution for management of the Oriners Station year-round is dry season<br />
access by vehicle <strong>to</strong> s<strong>to</strong>ck supplies for permanent residence and management, and isolated<br />
wet-season residence at the Oriners homestead by a smaller group of people. From the<br />
Oriners homestead base, access <strong>to</strong> the surrounding country during the wet season and early<br />
dry season for management and cultural purposes (i.e. fire, fishing, ceremony) can <strong>be</strong> by<br />
walking, and by quadbike when bogging and erosion risks are <strong>not</strong> <strong>to</strong>o great. Wet season<br />
emergency access and resupply would still need <strong>to</strong> <strong>be</strong> by helicopter, unless an all weather<br />
air strip can <strong>be</strong> developed.<br />
The isolation of Oriners also gives the area its character, and has resulted in it retaining<br />
considerable ecological value in a landscape where other parts of the Mitchell catchment are<br />
severely degraded (Strang 2004). As Viv Sinnamon recalled (1.6.5 ), David Hughes said at<br />
the time of the Kowanyama purchase that Oriners was „a piece of the way Cape York <strong>used</strong> <strong>to</strong><br />
<strong>be</strong>.‟ For the Hughes family as a whole, Oriners re<strong>pre</strong>sents one stage in an ongoing<br />
relationship <strong>with</strong> the country of the Mitchell catchment that now stretches back 100 years –<br />
Cecil Hughes first saw it in the 1950s, Colin Hughes spent his infancy there and mustered it<br />
as a teenager <strong>with</strong> his brother Brian, and David Hughes negotiated the sale <strong>to</strong> Kowanyama<br />
in the early 1990s. As Strang descri<strong>be</strong>s, the relationship <strong>be</strong>tween the Hughes‟ and the Yam<br />
family (which has the strongest traditional association <strong>with</strong> Oriners in the <strong>pre</strong>sent day), is<br />
similarly extensive, stretching back several generations <strong>to</strong> the early years of Koolatah Station<br />
(Strang 1997).<br />
However, Strang‟s detailed anthropological work <strong>with</strong> both white cattlemen and Indigenous<br />
people in the Mitchell also emphasises a level of incommensurability of perspectives<br />
<strong>be</strong>tween the two groups. The consequences of cultural differences and intertwined but very<br />
different his<strong>to</strong>ries impedes communication and understanding in a range of ways, <strong>not</strong> least in<br />
the sphere of wider catchment management in the Mitchell (Strang 2004). Strang‟s own work<br />
successfully identifies the underlying bases of the differences, an act which can sometimes<br />
have the effect of reinforcing them. However, when such analysis is done well, it more often<br />
enables the bridging of such differences, or at least provides the opportunity <strong>to</strong> avoid their<br />
most negative consequences. Despite this project‟s apparent differences in approach and its<br />
limited scope, it relies significantly on foundations and relationships which were facilitated by<br />
that <strong>pre</strong>vious successful research effort.<br />
„Working Knowledge‟ was developed here as the term <strong>be</strong>st able <strong>to</strong> summarise the kind of<br />
knowledge re<strong>cover</strong>ed and recorded in a project foc<strong>used</strong> on Indigenous and non-Indigenous<br />
cattlemen operating in a remote location. To use the language of Strang‟s primary account, it<br />
focuses on the „common ground‟ of a range of men familiar <strong>with</strong> the area. As descri<strong>be</strong>d in<br />
1.1, „Working Knowledge‟ simultaneously descri<strong>be</strong>s:<br />
Working Knowledge at Oriners Station, Cape York<br />
197