04.04.2013 Views

Download the report - The Healing Foundation

Download the report - The Healing Foundation

Download the report - The Healing Foundation

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

• <strong>The</strong> study reinforces and exemplifies findings in <strong>the</strong> related quantitative cross sectional<br />

and longitudinal surveys and has implications for our understanding of adaptation in<br />

visible difference and our ability to respond appropriately.<br />

RATIONALE<br />

Appearance altering conditions can be associated with a range of psychosocial difficulties, yet<br />

many people adapt positively and succeed in minimising <strong>the</strong> impact of visible<br />

difference/disfigurement on <strong>the</strong>ir lives.<br />

Previous research suggests that individual adjustment is affected by a complex interplay of<br />

physical, cultural and psychosocial factors (Thompson & Kent, 2001; Rumsey & Harcourt,<br />

2004). Small scale longitudinal qualitative studies have followed up people with visible<br />

difference over time. Most notably <strong>the</strong> early work of MacGregor (Macgregor et al, 1953;<br />

Macgregor, 1979) involved interviews over a sixteen year period. However, this work has not<br />

focussed on adaptation over <strong>the</strong> course of time and its relationship to events in <strong>the</strong> person’s life.<br />

Little is known about <strong>the</strong> course of psychological adjustment to appearance over time and<br />

factors which facilitate positive coping. Accordingly, our study sought to follow-up people with<br />

visible difference over nine months, with a specific focus on factors associated with better or<br />

worse adaptation to <strong>the</strong>ir appearance and its psychological concomitants.<br />

METHOD<br />

Aim<br />

To explore in depth individual explanations of adjustment to appearance over a nine-month<br />

period amongst those who defined <strong>the</strong>mselves as:<br />

1. Well adjusted to visible difference without variation during <strong>the</strong> study period (well adjusted<br />

stable).<br />

2. Poorly adjusted to visible difference without variation during <strong>the</strong> study period (distressed<br />

stable).<br />

3. Having experienced an improvement in adjustment during <strong>the</strong> study period<br />

(improvement in adjustment’).<br />

4. Having experienced a deterioration in adjustment during <strong>the</strong> study period (‘deterioration<br />

in adjustment’).<br />

Participants and Sampling<br />

Participants were attendees at NHS clinics for a variety of appearance-related issues who had<br />

completed measures at baseline and 9 month follow-up in our associated quantitative study.<br />

Participants answered a questionnaire item in this study to self-select into one of <strong>the</strong> four<br />

categories above. Twenty-six participants were recruited to <strong>the</strong> qualitative longitudinal study.<br />

101

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!