04.04.2013 Views

Download the report - The Healing Foundation

Download the report - The Healing Foundation

Download the report - The Healing Foundation

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Table 5.1(c) Frequency of number of areas <strong>report</strong>ed as sensitive according to gender.<br />

None<br />

Marked<br />

One Two Three Four Five 6 or more Total<br />

Female N 95 201 153 134 90 73 121 867<br />

% 11.0 23.2 17.6 15.5 10.4 8.4 14.0 100<br />

Male N 77 113 58 33 24 11 38 354<br />

% 21.8 31.9 16.4 9.3 6.8 3.1 10.7 100<br />

In relation to <strong>the</strong> number of areas <strong>report</strong>ed as sensitive, <strong>the</strong> application of <strong>the</strong> chi-square test of<br />

association indicates that <strong>the</strong>re are statistically significant differences in <strong>the</strong> profiles between<br />

male and female ( = 51.21, df = 6, p < .001) with females <strong>report</strong>ing considerably more areas<br />

of concern and with a statistically significant linear component ( = 33.99, df = 1, p < .001).<br />

See Table 5.1(c) for frequencies.<br />

Table 5.1(d) Mean values for outcome measures by visibility to o<strong>the</strong>rs<br />

Visible/non N DAS24 Anxiety Depression Aggression Positive Negative<br />

visible<br />

Affect Affect<br />

Female Yes 404 46.67(15.45) 9.26(4.70) 5.55(3.82) 26.03(9.42) 30.52(8.82) 21.73(9.05)<br />

No 460 43.44(16.67) 8.15(4.52) 4.81(3.73) 24.21(9.35) 31.46(8.99) 19.80(8.52)<br />

Male Yes 165 38.32(15.03) 7.62(4.35) 5.43(3.93) 26.52(9.32) 31.92(9.06) 19.66(8.02)<br />

No 188 33.72(13.82) 6.40(4.33) 4.56(3.54) 25.68(8.82) 34.16(7.93) 17.18(7.26)<br />

* 48 = missing data<br />

Two-way ANOVAs show that females <strong>report</strong> significantly poorer mean values than males on<br />

DAS24, HADS Anxiety, Positive Affect and Negative Affect (p < .001, in all cases) and those<br />

with a visible concern <strong>report</strong> significantly poorer mean values on DAS24, HADS Anxiety, HADS<br />

Depression, Positive Affect and Negative Affect (p < .001, all cases) and on Aggression (p =<br />

.024)<br />

5.2 Age<br />

Table 5.2(a) summarises <strong>the</strong> extent of <strong>the</strong> correlation between age and each outcome measure<br />

according to gender. In all cases <strong>the</strong> correlations <strong>report</strong>ed are statistically significant correlations<br />

(p < .001).<br />

Table 5.2(a) Correlation of outcome variables with age<br />

DAS24 Anxiety Depression Aggression Positive Affect Negative Affect N<br />

Female -.325 -.209 -.068 -.321 .121 -.272 865<br />

Male -.393 -.210 -.124 -.277 .000 -.292 351<br />

40

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!