Download the report - The Healing Foundation
Download the report - The Healing Foundation
Download the report - The Healing Foundation
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
anxiety was in <strong>the</strong> low to mild range, <strong>the</strong> level for positive affect was quite high, and negative<br />
affect quite low compared with normative values. <strong>The</strong> mean level for aggression fell in <strong>the</strong> low to<br />
moderate range. However, <strong>the</strong> variance in <strong>the</strong> sample was high, and substantial numbers of<br />
participants showed significant levels of distress.<br />
<strong>The</strong> data from clinic attendees was examined for any notable patterns of adjustment or distress.<br />
<strong>The</strong>re are many difficulties inherent in classifying <strong>the</strong> various conditions which result in<br />
disfigurement (for example, patients attending a dermatology or plastics clinic will have<br />
disfigurements resulting from a large number of different aetiologies). Accordingly our analysis<br />
was limited to differences in <strong>the</strong> type of clinic attended. <strong>The</strong> overall impression resulting from<br />
this analysis was <strong>the</strong> similarity in profiles from <strong>the</strong> various clinics – once again adding to <strong>the</strong><br />
impression that individual psychological factors and processes were a bigger determinant of<br />
adjustment. Taken on its own however, <strong>the</strong> lack of differences between clinics in this data set<br />
should be treated with caution. Despite minimum recruitment targets for every clinic, <strong>the</strong><br />
challenges of recruitment and <strong>the</strong> resulting sample sizes varied considerably. <strong>The</strong> profile for<br />
participants with a cleft of <strong>the</strong> lip and/or palate is one of greater distress for negative affect,<br />
aggression and anxiety than for participants from o<strong>the</strong>r clinics. However, <strong>the</strong> sample is also <strong>the</strong><br />
smallest (n=11), reflecting <strong>the</strong> low preponderance of patients of 18 years and over attending this<br />
particular out-patient clinic. In addition, adjustment profiles may vary as a result of <strong>the</strong> age<br />
profiles of attendees (for example, <strong>the</strong> preponderance of older adults attending melanoma and<br />
Rheumatoid Arthritis clinics).<br />
Demographic variables<br />
<strong>The</strong> mean age of participants was 47 years, with a range of 18-91 years. <strong>The</strong> respondents in<br />
this study represent a sample with an older profile than in <strong>the</strong> majority of previous research,<br />
offering a useful insight into <strong>the</strong> appearance concerns in middle and older adulthood. <strong>The</strong>re<br />
were negative correlations between increasing age and scores for social anxiety and social<br />
avoidance, aggression, negative affect, depression and anxiety. So, bearing in mind <strong>the</strong><br />
limitations of a cross-sectional sample, <strong>the</strong> picture in this study is one of positive adjustment<br />
increasing with age. However <strong>the</strong> relationships are not dramatic and many older participants<br />
were concerned and distressed about <strong>the</strong>ir appearance. <strong>The</strong>se results are consistent with<br />
previous research, and should not be taken as indicating that appearance concerns are <strong>the</strong><br />
preserve only of <strong>the</strong> young.<br />
<strong>The</strong> importance of appearance in late adolescence and early adulthood has been highlighted by<br />
many (Harris & Carr 2001; Liossi 2003; Lovegrove & Rumsey, 2005), and Cash et al’s (1986)<br />
survey of 15-74 years found that body image concerns diminished with age. However, Rosser<br />
(2008) has also pointed out that <strong>the</strong> role of age in appearance adjustment is not straightforward,<br />
and Lansdown, Lloyd and Hunter (1991) pointed to <strong>the</strong> crucial role of appearance concerns<br />
throughout <strong>the</strong> lifespan. Rumsey and Harcourt (2005) <strong>report</strong>ed data from older people (over 60<br />
years) with skin conditions which indicated that although fewer people in this age group<br />
expressed significant concerns, a sizable proportion were distressed about aspects of <strong>the</strong>ir<br />
appearance. Ra<strong>the</strong>r than a reduction in levels of concern compared with younger people, <strong>the</strong><br />
60