04.04.2013 Views

Download the report - The Healing Foundation

Download the report - The Healing Foundation

Download the report - The Healing Foundation

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

.<br />

more infirm as <strong>the</strong>y say, <strong>the</strong>n I shall sit and probably think about it more but I do<br />

try to keep my mind on o<strong>the</strong>r things to take me off it” (03/clin/1037/prosth)<br />

“Well usually when I'm with friends and that or relatives you know you put a brave<br />

face on kind of thing and <strong>the</strong>n I can laugh about it, depending on how I feel in<br />

myself you know and <strong>the</strong>n o<strong>the</strong>r times you know it just gets to you”<br />

(03/clin/1037/prosth)<br />

Stage 3 – outcomes – changed improved group<br />

In this group, planning for change and acceptance of change were <strong>report</strong>ed.<br />

“We are...<strong>the</strong> house is on <strong>the</strong> market. I don’t know when whe<strong>the</strong>r it’s gonna sell<br />

but we are hoping to move up to North Wales to be close to Nigel’s family, and<br />

buy something small and that’s a very significant part of my rehabilitation, can I<br />

call it. This is just; this house is too big for us” (01/clin/0034/eye)<br />

.<br />

Visible difference was also seem as a catalyst for health related behavioural change:<br />

“Stopping smoking [after leg amputation]. I only ever stopped once before in my<br />

life for 8 months because I was a very heavy smoker which caused <strong>the</strong> loss of my<br />

leg actually”(03/clin/1047/prosth)<br />

Stage 3 – Outcomes – changed deteriorated group<br />

It was not possible to identify common <strong>the</strong>mes in behaviour change for this group. This is<br />

probably because this group was itself very heterogeneous, with changes occurring for a broad<br />

range of reasons.<br />

Comparisons between self-selected adjustment groups using data derived from <strong>the</strong><br />

questionnaires<br />

Stable coping well group<br />

<strong>The</strong>re were no significant differences between mean scores at time one and time two on <strong>the</strong><br />

HADS for this subset of participants (anxiety subscale Z = -1.37, p = 0.16, depression subscale<br />

Z = -1.55, p = 0.12), DAS (Z = -0.77, p = 0.44) or FNE (Z = -0.15, p = 0.87). RCI scores however<br />

showed significant improvement on <strong>the</strong> HADS (anxiety subscale n=2, depression subscale n=1)<br />

and FNE (n=2), as well as significant deterioration on <strong>the</strong> FNE (n=1).<br />

Despite having self selected as coping well, three participants scored within <strong>the</strong> clinical range<br />

for <strong>the</strong> HADS anxiety or depression subscale at time one and two. <strong>The</strong>re were also a wide<br />

range of scores for both DAS 24 (22-54) and FNE (21-59) measures suggesting variability in<br />

111

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!