04.04.2013 Views

Download the report - The Healing Foundation

Download the report - The Healing Foundation

Download the report - The Healing Foundation

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Anger/hostility<br />

<strong>The</strong> Refined Aggression Questionnaire (RAQ) (Bryant and Smith 2001) is a brief version of<br />

Buss and Perry’s (1992) Aggression Questionnaire and has been found to have similar<br />

psychometric properties (Bryant and Smith 2001). This aggression scale uses 12 items to<br />

assess whe<strong>the</strong>r aggressive behaviour is characteristic of <strong>the</strong> respondent, with responses<br />

ranging from strongly disagree to strongly agree. Divided into 4 factors, physical aggression,<br />

hostility, verbal aggression and anger each factor has an individual score with lower scores<br />

representing lower levels of that particular type of aggression. <strong>The</strong> scale score ranged from 3-15<br />

after appropriate item score reversals.<br />

PROCEDURE<br />

Research governance<br />

Ethical approval for <strong>the</strong> study was given by NRES (one original application for all centres was<br />

granted by COREC in addition to site specific approvals from each trust and data collection site)<br />

and each corresponding university ethics committee for <strong>the</strong> research sites (five applications).<br />

Criminal Records Bureau checks and honorary contracts with each NHS trust for each<br />

researcher recruiting in clinics were also secured.<br />

As <strong>the</strong> research programme developed, <strong>the</strong> lead site (UWE) was also required to apply for<br />

substantial and minor amendments to NRES to undertake <strong>the</strong> follow-on studies (six<br />

amendments in total). All additions and minor changes to <strong>the</strong> original protocol (for example, <strong>the</strong><br />

reduction of <strong>the</strong> longitudinal data point for <strong>the</strong> cross sectional questionnaire to nine months from<br />

12 months) were agreed by NRES and local university ethics committees. For copies of <strong>the</strong><br />

main ethical approvals and amendments see appendix 4.<br />

Protocols relating to recruitment<br />

Outpatient clinics<br />

Patients attending <strong>the</strong> participating out-patient clinics were sent invitations to take part along<br />

with an information sheet (see appendix 5) two weeks prior to <strong>the</strong>ir appointment. <strong>The</strong> researcher<br />

approached potential participants on <strong>the</strong> day of <strong>the</strong>ir appointment explaining <strong>the</strong> nature of <strong>the</strong><br />

study and answering any potential questions. Once informed consent (see appendix 6 for<br />

consent form) was obtained, participants were given a questionnaire booklet ei<strong>the</strong>r to complete<br />

in clinic or to be taken away and sent back via freepost envelope. All participants took part on a<br />

voluntary basis and were not remunerated for <strong>the</strong>ir participation.<br />

Once received, data was stored securely (see below), receipt was logged and thank you letters<br />

were sent to each participant.<br />

32

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!