04.04.2013 Views

Download the report - The Healing Foundation

Download the report - The Healing Foundation

Download the report - The Healing Foundation

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Table 3.1 Response rates for responders and non-responders at follow-up<br />

Non-Responders Responders<br />

Gender Female 611 (69.7) 256 (74.4)<br />

Male 266 (30.3) 88 (25.6)<br />

Total 877 (100%) 344 (100%)<br />

Recruitment Community 438 (47.8) 176 (50.4)<br />

Clinic 478 (52.2) 173 (49.6)<br />

916 (100%) 349 (100%)<br />

Concern Visible 424 (46.3) 168 (48.1)<br />

Not Visible 492 (53.7) 181 (51.9)<br />

916 (100%) 349 (100%)<br />

Independent samples t-test revealed that those who responded at follow-up had a significantly<br />

higher mean level of appearance discrepancy (p < 0.001) and valence (p = 0.002) than those<br />

who did not respond, although <strong>the</strong> effects sizes were small (d = 0.24) (Table 3.2).<br />

Table 3.2 T-test comparisons between responders and non-responders at follow-up<br />

Measure Non-Responders 1 Responders 2<br />

Mean SD Mean SD p<br />

Discrepancy 29.21 11.36 31.90 11.33

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!