Crocker, J., Voelkl, K., Testa, M. and Major, B. (1991). Social stigma: <strong>the</strong> affective consequences of attributional ambiguity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 218- 228. Culley, L., Hudson, N., and Rapport, F. (2007). Using focus groups with minority ethnic communities: researching infertility in British South Asian Communities. Qualitative Health Research, 17, 102-12. Demet, K., Martinet, N., Francis, G., Paysant, J. and Andre, J. (2003). Health related quality of life and related factors in 539 persons with amputation of upper and lower limb. Disability Rehabilitation, 25, 480–6. Denscombe, M. (2008). Communities of practice: a research paradigm for <strong>the</strong> mixed methods approach. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 22, 351 – 72. Derogatis, L. R., Lipman, R. S., Rickels, K., Uhlenhuth, E. H., and Covi, L. (1974). <strong>The</strong> Hopkins Symptom Checklist (HSCL): a self-<strong>report</strong> symptom inventory. Behavioral Science, 19, 1-15. Dures, E. (2009). An Exploration of <strong>the</strong> Psychosocial Impact of Epidermolysis Bullosa on <strong>the</strong> Daily Lives of Affected Adults and Identification of Associated Support Needs. Unpublished PhD <strong>The</strong>sis, University of <strong>the</strong> West of England. Eiserman, W. (2001). Unique outcomes and positive contributions associated with facial difference: expanding research and practice. Cleft Palate Craniofacial Journal, 38, 236–44. El-Miedany, Y.M. and El Rasheed, A.H. (2002). Is anxiety a more common disorder than depression in rheumatoid arthritis? Joint Bone Spine, 69, 300-06. Endriga, M. and Kapp-Simon, K. (1999). Psychological issues in craniofacial care: state of <strong>the</strong> art. Cleft Palate Craniofacial Journal, 36, 3 – 11. Engel, G.L. (1980). <strong>The</strong> clinical application of <strong>the</strong> biopsychosocial model. American Journal of Psychiatry. 137, 535-44. Evers, A.W.M., Kraaimaat, F.W., Geenen, R. and Bijlsma, J.W.J. (1997). Determinants of psychological distress and its course in <strong>the</strong> first year after diagnosis in rheumatoid arthritis patients. Journal of Behavioural Medicine, 20, 489-503. Fagervik-Morton, H. (In preparation). What psychological and social factors exacerbate distress and/or promote psychosocial adjustment among adults with congenital and acquired visible difference not related to surgical medical procedures? A systematic review. Fauerbach, J.A., Heinberg, L.J., Lawrence, J.W. and Bryant, A.G. (2002). Coping with body image changes following a disfiguring burn injury. Health Psychology, 21, 115-21. 218
Faulkner, L., & Thompson, A. R (2006). Managing intrusive reactions to visible difference. Oral presentation at <strong>the</strong> Appearance Matters Conference, Bath, 07/06/06 Festinger, L. (1954). A <strong>the</strong>ory of social comparison processes. Human Relations, 7, 117-40. Firooz, A., Bouzari, N., Fallah, N., Ghazisaidi, B., Firoozabadi, M. R., and Dowlati, Y. (2004). What patients with vitiligo believe about <strong>the</strong>ir condition. International Journal of Dermatology, 43, 811-4. Fortune, D., Richards, H., Griffiths, C. and Main, C. (2005). Adversarial growth in patients undergoing treatment for psoriasis: a prospective study of <strong>the</strong> ability of patients to construe benefits from negative events. Psychology, Health and Medicine, 10, 44-56. Frances, J. (2003). Educating Children with Facial Disfigurement: Creating Inclusive School Communities. New York: Routledge Falmer. Frith, H. (2000). Focusing on sex: using focus groups in sex research. Sexualities, 3, 275-97. Gamba, A., Romano, M., Grosso, I.M., Tamburini, M., Cantu, G., Molinari, R. and Ventafridda, V. (1992). Psychosocial adjustment of patients surgically treated for <strong>the</strong> head and neck cancer. Head and Neck, 14, 218-23. Gibbons, F.X. and Buunk, B.P. (1999). Individual differences in social comparison: development of a scale of social comparison orientation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 129-42. Gilbert, P., Broomhead, C., Irons, C., McEwan, K., Bellew, R., Mills, A., et al. (2007). Development of a Striving to Avoid Inferiority Scale. British Journal of Social Psychology, 46, 633-48. Gilbert, S. and Thompson, J. (2002). Body shame in childhood and adolescence, in P. Gilbert and J. Miles (eds) Body Shame: Conceptualisation, Research and Treatment. Hove: Brunner- Routledge. Goff, L.M. and Barasi, M. (1999). An assessment of <strong>the</strong> diets of people with Rheumatoid Arthritis. Journal of Human Nutrition and Dietetics, 12, 93–101. Goffman, E. (1963). Stigma: Notes on <strong>the</strong> Management of <strong>the</strong> Spoiled Identity. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall. Green, J.D. and Sedikides, C. (2001). When do self-schemas shape social perception? <strong>The</strong> role of descriptive ambiguity. Motivation and Emotion, 25, 67-83. 219
- Page 1:
Identifying the psychosocial factor
- Page 4 and 5:
Follow-on Studies: Emma Halliwell,
- Page 6 and 7:
Warwick Site (Lead: Dr. Rodger Char
- Page 8 and 9:
SECTION 3 Page OVERALL SYNTHESIS OF
- Page 10 and 11:
Study 3 3.1 Response rates for resp
- Page 13 and 14:
Introduction EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This
- Page 15 and 16:
The Impact of Appearance-Related Di
- Page 17:
Research Further investigation shou
- Page 20 and 21:
Participants were recruited from ho
- Page 23 and 24:
BACKGROUND & RATIONALE FOR THE RESE
- Page 25 and 26:
The challenge of developing compreh
- Page 27 and 28:
STAGE ONE (Inputs/Predisposing Fact
- Page 29 and 30:
In order to address the first aim o
- Page 31 and 32:
Role of the advisory panel in the r
- Page 33:
credit is due to Anjte Lindenmeyer,
- Page 36 and 37:
INTRODUCTION The largest part of th
- Page 38 and 39:
South West (via the Bristol site) a
- Page 40 and 41:
INPUTS/ PREDISPOSING FACTORS Age Ge
- Page 42 and 43:
Appearance-related processing Valen
- Page 44 and 45:
Anger/hostility The Refined Aggress
- Page 46 and 47:
RESULTS Due to the size of the data
- Page 48 and 49:
Figure 4.1(b) Comparative box-and-w
- Page 50 and 51:
Table 4.2 Correlation of quantitati
- Page 52 and 53:
Table 5.1(c) Frequency of number of
- Page 54 and 55:
Table 6.1(a) Frequency and percenta
- Page 56 and 57:
Table 7.1 summarises the degree of
- Page 58 and 59:
Figure 7.1(a): Scores on the DAS 24
- Page 60 and 61:
10.1 Appearance-related Social Anxi
- Page 62 and 63:
HADS Anxiety, and the relative magn
- Page 64 and 65:
10.4 Aggression When entering the v
- Page 66 and 67:
elatively small but statistically s
- Page 68 and 69:
11. Clinic Specific Data In order t
- Page 70 and 71:
Table 11.3: Percentage of participa
- Page 72 and 73:
anxiety was in the low to mild rang
- Page 74 and 75:
Visibility and areas of concern The
- Page 76 and 77:
affect and 46% for both anxiety and
- Page 78 and 79:
likely they are to have difficultie
- Page 80 and 81:
Information Attention Encoding/Stor
- Page 82 and 83:
such as shame, were omitted. Where
- Page 84 and 85:
RATIONALE In an attempt to offer pa
- Page 86 and 87:
FINDINGS Theme I. Descriptive Accou
- Page 88 and 89:
easts made her ‘flat chested’ a
- Page 90 and 91:
confidence to other people’s reac
- Page 92 and 93:
them noticing: ‘I try to hide my
- Page 94 and 95:
5.) Time Structures What was striki
- Page 97 and 98:
STUDY 3 LONGITUDINAL QUANTITATIVE S
- Page 99 and 100:
Table 3.1 Response rates for respon
- Page 101 and 102:
Table 3.4 Regression Model for DAS2
- Page 103 and 104:
Table 3.6 Regression Model for Depr
- Page 105 and 106:
Table 3.8 Regression Model for Posi
- Page 107 and 108:
0.016), and optimism (r = -0.183, n
- Page 109:
and follow up). However, focusing o
- Page 112 and 113:
SUMMARY • Twenty-six participants
- Page 114 and 115:
There were ten well adjusted stable
- Page 116 and 117:
Stage 1 - predisposing factors - ch
- Page 118 and 119:
Appearance schema - beliefs about o
- Page 120 and 121:
“I’m in charge ...I think that
- Page 122 and 123:
“Only when people don’t underst
- Page 124 and 125:
appearance anxiety and coping with
- Page 126 and 127:
114
- Page 128 and 129:
116
- Page 130 and 131:
SUMMARY • This study aimed to exp
- Page 132 and 133:
A focus group methodology was chose
- Page 134 and 135:
any situation. Strategies involved
- Page 136 and 137:
CONCLUSIONS Whereas previous resear
- Page 138 and 139:
SUMMARY • Nine focus group interv
- Page 140 and 141:
RESULTS Eight key themes were ident
- Page 142 and 143:
2e. Medical Interpretation There wa
- Page 144 and 145:
“I think I am nicer to a person w
- Page 146 and 147:
6d. Generational differences Elders
- Page 148 and 149:
• The myths about the foetal diso
- Page 150 and 151:
SUMMARY • Vitiligo is a condition
- Page 152 and 153:
identified themselves as South Asia
- Page 154 and 155:
“…my parents would have been de
- Page 156 and 157:
2a. Appearance shame and disgust Ma
- Page 158 and 159:
much…sometimes I just want to bec
- Page 160 and 161:
For respondents like AA (described
- Page 162 and 163:
study 6, that in addition to indivi
- Page 164 and 165:
AIMS The aims of this study were to
- Page 166 and 167:
154
- Page 168 and 169:
SUMMARY • Participants (n=38) too
- Page 170 and 171:
leaving 82 invitations not responde
- Page 172 and 173:
The vignettes alternated between de
- Page 174 and 175:
162
- Page 176 and 177:
SUMMARY • The study involved the
- Page 178 and 179:
METHOD Participants Student sample
- Page 180 and 181: Clinic attendees On the anxiety sub
- Page 182 and 183: 170
- Page 184 and 185: SUMMARY • Semi-structured intervi
- Page 186 and 187: Seven key themes were identified an
- Page 188 and 189: “I've heard tell that a lot of pe
- Page 190 and 191: 4. Physical adaptation From so smal
- Page 192 and 193: 6. Emotional impact & Emotional sup
- Page 194 and 195: 182
- Page 196 and 197: SUMMARY • This study investigates
- Page 198 and 199: Table 12.1 Demographic data by grou
- Page 200 and 201: variance in anxious mood was accoun
- Page 202 and 203: appearance of younger people (Harri
- Page 204 and 205: SUMMARY • This study is recruitin
- Page 206 and 207: METHOD Participants GPs from across
- Page 208 and 209: 196
- Page 210 and 211: The results of each study have been
- Page 212 and 213: Others expressed dissatisfaction wi
- Page 214 and 215: Age Gender Ethnicity Relationship s
- Page 216 and 217: Whilst the main thrust of this rese
- Page 218 and 219: a strong evidence base in other are
- Page 220 and 221: Nurses in a counseling role, clinic
- Page 222 and 223: 210
- Page 224 and 225: This series of studies represents t
- Page 226 and 227: 214
- Page 228 and 229: Ben-Tovim, D.I. and Walker, M.K. (1
- Page 232 and 233: Greenberg, L. S. and Safran, J. D.
- Page 234 and 235: Macgregor, F., Abel, T.M., Brut, A.
- Page 236 and 237: Pollard, L., Choy, E.H. and Scott,
- Page 238 and 239: Scheier, M.F., Carver, C.S. and Bri
- Page 240 and 241: Wright, G.E., Parker, J.C., Smarr,