05.04.2013 Views

Marcus Aurelius Antoninus to Himself - College of Stoic Philosophers

Marcus Aurelius Antoninus to Himself - College of Stoic Philosophers

Marcus Aurelius Antoninus to Himself - College of Stoic Philosophers

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

xxxiv INTRODUCTION SECT.<br />

injunction, Know thyself, and in the formulas, Virtue is<br />

knowledge Virtue may be taught 1 No one wilfully goes<br />

wrong 11<br />

Virtue results in happiness; and all these<br />

maxims are first principles <strong>of</strong> S<strong>to</strong>ic dogma. In respect<br />

<strong>of</strong> all, S<strong>to</strong>icism at least in its later exponents adheres<br />

more closely <strong>to</strong> the Socratic tradition than any other<br />

school ; and, alike in temper and interest, Epictetus re-<br />

produces the teaching <strong>of</strong> the master more faithfully than<br />

any <strong>of</strong> his disciples or more immediate successors.<br />

The power <strong>of</strong> the Socratic conclusions lay in affirm-<br />

ing the ultimate harmony <strong>of</strong> morality with reason, and<br />

in vindicating for the results <strong>of</strong> reason real and authori-<br />

tative validity. Man's moral sense, the existence <strong>of</strong><br />

which is irrefragable, demands and certifies the reality<br />

<strong>of</strong> knowledge. The weakness <strong>of</strong> the affirmations,<br />

regarded as a system <strong>of</strong> ethics, apart from the confusion<br />

<strong>of</strong> will with knowledge, lay in defective and<br />

confused analysis <strong>of</strong> the contents <strong>of</strong> 'goodness.' To<br />

give positive meaning and efficacy <strong>to</strong> the dictum, *<br />

Virtue<br />

is knowledge,' it was indispensable <strong>to</strong> define with some<br />

precision the subject-matter <strong>of</strong> the knowledge meant.<br />

To explain it as '<br />

knowledge <strong>of</strong> the good '<br />

mere tau<strong>to</strong>logy, until the contents <strong>of</strong> *<br />

goodness '<br />

enumerated or defined. According<br />

reduced it <strong>to</strong><br />

were<br />

as the idea <strong>of</strong><br />

pleasure or advantage or prosperity was permitted <strong>to</strong><br />

preponderate, the maxim could be turned <strong>to</strong> Hedonistic,<br />

Utilitarian, or Eudsemonistic inferences, so that by<br />

variety <strong>of</strong> emphasis broadly contrasted types <strong>of</strong> ethical<br />

1 Cf. vi. 27 ; viii. 59 ; ix. 11 ; x. 4 ; xi. 18 (9).<br />

2 ii. I ; iv. 3 ; vii. 22, 62, 63 ; viii. 14 ; x. 30 ; xi. 18 (3) ;<br />

xii. 12.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!