05.04.2013 Views

Marcus Aurelius Antoninus to Himself - College of Stoic Philosophers

Marcus Aurelius Antoninus to Himself - College of Stoic Philosophers

Marcus Aurelius Antoninus to Himself - College of Stoic Philosophers

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

in 2 STOIC DOGMA lix<br />

2. Cosmic Pantheism<br />

The thought <strong>of</strong> the world as a living organism had<br />

early found a place in philosophy, and was indeed the<br />

philosophical restatement <strong>of</strong> that animism, which seems<br />

almost the instinctive assumption in man's first guesses<br />

at an explanation <strong>of</strong> phenomena. It was as natural <strong>to</strong><br />

attribute personal life <strong>to</strong> the Universe at large as <strong>to</strong><br />

Sun and Star, Ocean and River, tree and spring. But<br />

the progress <strong>of</strong> Greek thought tended <strong>to</strong> discredit this<br />

theory <strong>of</strong> the universe, and <strong>to</strong> exclude it from the<br />

Schools by substituting either the purely mechanical<br />

explanations <strong>of</strong> the Ionian School, which culminated<br />

in the a<strong>to</strong>mic theory <strong>of</strong> Democritus, or by inferring the<br />

existence <strong>of</strong> a creative power exterior <strong>to</strong> the action <strong>of</strong><br />

phenomena. The reversion <strong>of</strong> Zeno <strong>to</strong> an explanation,<br />

which had virtually fallen out <strong>of</strong> Greek consideration,<br />

suggests importation from without,<br />

<strong>to</strong> which the after-<br />

thought <strong>of</strong> combination with Heraclitean physics is<br />

by no means adverse. Whatever be the truth <strong>of</strong> this,<br />

it seems clear that Zeno did not argue up <strong>to</strong> monistic<br />

or pantheistic belief from Hellenic premises <strong>of</strong> thought,<br />

but that his main affirmation was rather a sudden and<br />

daring postulate, assumed as a theory <strong>of</strong> things, and then<br />

gradually substantiated or corroborated, partly by himself<br />

and partly by his successors, as the one intelligible reading<br />

<strong>of</strong> phenomena regarded as a whole.<br />

S<strong>to</strong>icism was assimilative rather than derivative ; the<br />

strength <strong>of</strong> the system lies in coherence rather than in<br />

a priori pro<strong>of</strong>, and rests less on central stability than

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!