05.04.2013 Views

Marcus Aurelius Antoninus to Himself - College of Stoic Philosophers

Marcus Aurelius Antoninus to Himself - College of Stoic Philosophers

Marcus Aurelius Antoninus to Himself - College of Stoic Philosophers

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Ix INTRODUCTION SECT.<br />

on skilful combination <strong>of</strong> auxiliary supports and out-<br />

works. The monistic core is in constant danger <strong>of</strong><br />

falling apart, and needs ingenious buttressing. The<br />

unity <strong>of</strong> the world was only explicable as the expression<br />

<strong>of</strong> a single power, and Zeno ventured <strong>to</strong> assume that<br />

power<br />

consciousness in man. No rival theory could be said <strong>to</strong><br />

<strong>to</strong> be identical with that which declares itself as<br />

hold the field, or <strong>to</strong> give satisfaction <strong>to</strong> the intellect ; and<br />

the general position <strong>of</strong> the school might be stated thus.<br />

Pla<strong>to</strong>nic theory, and still more the rarer metaphysic <strong>of</strong><br />

Aris<strong>to</strong>tle, exacted a belief in some immaterial dpx*j or<br />

beginning, as the first cause <strong>of</strong> all material existence.<br />

To one disciplined in Cynic or Megarian modes <strong>of</strong><br />

thought, the demand was in<strong>to</strong>lerable and even meaningless.<br />

There could be neither cause .nor being without<br />

body, which alone supplied the capacity for acting or<br />

being acted upon. Whatever the first cause might be,<br />

it certainly could not be incorporeal, transcendent in<br />

other words non-existent. So far, assuredly, Democritus<br />

was right. Upon the other hand,<br />

assuredly one, not many.<br />

the first cause was<br />

The Democritean theory <strong>of</strong><br />

identical mechanical action in an infinite number <strong>of</strong><br />

isolated a<strong>to</strong>ms 1 met the problem <strong>of</strong> existence and <strong>of</strong><br />

fixity in things. It had the advantage <strong>of</strong> the Academic<br />

or the Peripatetic supposition in being compatible with<br />

thought, but it was incompatible<br />

behaviour and course<br />

2<br />

<strong>of</strong> things.<br />

tradiction, though<br />

did not attempt <strong>to</strong> give<br />

with the observed<br />

It involved a con-<br />

not an absolute denial <strong>of</strong> reason. It<br />

account <strong>of</strong> the order and un-<br />

1 Cf. iv. 45-<br />

2<br />

ix. 39 ; x. 6 xi. 18.<br />

;

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!