10.04.2013 Views

Linguistics Encyclopedia.pdf

Linguistics Encyclopedia.pdf

Linguistics Encyclopedia.pdf

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

It was an Easter egg that Tomas gave to Sophie.<br />

The most usual themes in English are those realized by the grammatical subject of the<br />

clause, and these are are called unmarked themes; when the theme is something other<br />

than the subject, it is called marked theme (examples (4) and (5)).<br />

In its interpersonal function, as an interactive event, an exchange between speakers,<br />

the clause in English is organized in terms of mood. Mood is the relationship between the<br />

grammatical subject of the clause and the finite element of the verbal group, with the<br />

remainder of the clause called the residue. So any indicative clause—a clause which has<br />

a subject and a finite element will have a mood structure. Subject and finite together<br />

make up the proposition of the clause, the part that can be affirmed, denied, questioned,<br />

and negotiated by speakers in other ways (wished about, hoped for, demanded, etc.). The<br />

grammatical subject of a declarative clause is recognizable as that element which is<br />

picked up in the pronoun of a tag (1985, p. 73):<br />

So in order to locate the Subject, add a tag (if one is not already present)<br />

and see which element is taken up. For example, that teapot was given to<br />

your aunt: here the tag would be wasn’t it?—we cannot add wasn’t she?.<br />

On the other hand with that teapot your aunt got from the duke the tag<br />

would be didn’t she?; we cannot say didn’t he? or wasn’t it?<br />

It is that by reference to which the proposition is affirmed, denied, etc. The finite element<br />

further enhances the proposition as something to negotiate by (1) giving it a primary<br />

tense (past, present, future) and (2) a modality, an indication of the speaker’s attitude in<br />

terms of certainty and obligation to what s/he is saying. Halliday represents the finite<br />

verbal operators as in Table 1(1985, p. 75).<br />

Temporal operators<br />

Table 1<br />

Past Present Future<br />

did, was, does, is, will, shall,<br />

had, used to has would, should<br />

Modal operators<br />

A-Z 193<br />

Low Median High<br />

can, may will, must, ought to,<br />

could, might would, should, is to, was to need, has to, had to<br />

There are two moods within the indicative, realized through the ordering of subject and<br />

finite (1985, p. 74):<br />

(a) The order Subject before Finite realizes ‘declarative’;<br />

(b) The order Finite before Subject realized ‘yes/no interrogative’;

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!