10.04.2013 Views

Linguistics Encyclopedia.pdf

Linguistics Encyclopedia.pdf

Linguistics Encyclopedia.pdf

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

The linguistics encyclopedia 228<br />

A universal set of well-formedness conditions is proposed to determine the permissible<br />

associations, as well as rules which operate on the tonal tier itself. In more recent work,<br />

other phenomena, such as vowel harmony (Clements, 1976) and nasalization (e.g.<br />

Hyman, 1982), have been given a similar treatment.<br />

Metrical phonology began as an interpretation of the stress rules of the SPE<br />

framework (see Liberman, 1975; Liberman and Prince, 1977), in which it was shown that<br />

the various stress levels could be derived from a hierarchically ordered arrangement of<br />

strong and weak nodes. Such a hierarchy results in a metrical grid from which the stress<br />

levels of individual syllables can be read off, e.g.:<br />

This theory, too, has been extended into other areas, such as syllable structure (Kahn,<br />

1976), and even into tonal structure, which in some cases can be shown to involve<br />

hierarchical organization.<br />

In both autosegmental and metrical phonology, a much richer phonological structure is<br />

postulated than that which underlies SPE, and this has been further developed so as to<br />

give a range of suprasegmental units such as syllables, feet, etc. (see Selkirk, 1980) or<br />

tiers such as tonal tier, nasalization tier, etc. The relationship and complementary<br />

nature of these theories have also been considered (Leben, 1982), and other hybrid<br />

theories have developed which combine features of both autosegmental and metrical<br />

principles, e.g. CV-phonology (Clements and Keyser, 1983). Other theories of<br />

generative phonology, e.g. lexical phonology (Mohanan, 1981), have also been<br />

considerably influenced by these non-linear frameworks (see Kiparsky,<br />

1982;Pulleyblank, 1986).<br />

The phonological representations assumed in these theories are very different from<br />

those of the SPE model, and there has been a shift of focus away from discussions of<br />

such issues as abstractness or rule ordering, and the appropriate formalisms, towards an<br />

exploration of the structural complexities of such representations. Nevertheless, many of<br />

the original principles of generative phonology, such as the postulation of an abstract<br />

underlying phonological structure related by rules to a phonetic representation, have not<br />

been abandoned.<br />

A.F.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!