10.04.2013 Views

Linguistics Encyclopedia.pdf

Linguistics Encyclopedia.pdf

Linguistics Encyclopedia.pdf

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

The linguistics encyclopedia 224<br />

derive the phonemes and to derive the allophones. Hence the phoneme has no place in the<br />

GP framework; phonemic transcriptions are, according to Chomsky and Halle, merely<br />

‘regularized phonetic representations’, while ‘complementary distribution’, the<br />

fundamental criterion of phonemic analysis, is ‘devoid of any theoretical significance’<br />

(Chomsky, 1964a, p. 93).<br />

Since the lexical representation is intended to contain only non-predictable<br />

information, it will take the form of redundancy-free feature matrices in which<br />

predictable features are unspecified. Since, however, redundant features may be required<br />

for the operation of phonological rules, these features must be inserted by a set of<br />

conventions, redundancy rules or morphemestructure rules, which express in indirect<br />

form the constraints on segment types and morpheme structures in the language<br />

concerned. These rules, together with rules to eliminate superfluous structure etc. are<br />

called readjustment rules, and they will apply before the application of the phonological<br />

rules proper.<br />

The rules of the phonological component thus operate on fully specified feature<br />

matrices constituting the phonological, or underlying, representation. These rules are of<br />

the form:<br />

A→B/ C——D<br />

where A is the feature matrix of the affected segment(s), and B the resulting matrix; C<br />

and D represent the context,——being, the position of the affected segment(s) A. In the<br />

standard theory these rules are in part ordered so as to apply in a fixed sequence. Thus,<br />

from English /k/ we can derive [s] and : electric [k], electricity [s], and electrician<br />

; but since is also derived from [s] in, e.g., racial, cf. race, the of electrician<br />

is best derived by two ordered rules: /k/→[s], [s]→ .<br />

The application of rules may be constrained by grammatical factors. Thus the rules for<br />

English stress depend on whether the word is a noun or a verb: 'import v. im'porl, while<br />

the realization of German /x/ as [x] or [ç] in words such as Kuchen [ ] (‘cake’) and<br />

Kuhchen [ ] (‘little cow’) depends on the morphological structure of the words,<br />

which can be represented as / / and / / respectively. There is therefore no<br />

need for the phonemic ‘separation of levels’, nor for ‘juncture phonemes’ (see<br />

PHONEMICS).<br />

A special case of the relationship between syntax and phonology is the cyclical<br />

application of rules, where some sets of rules may reapply to progressively larger<br />

morphological or syntactic domains. In the description of English stress, which takes up a<br />

large part of SPE, the different stress patterns of blackboard eraser and black boarderaser<br />

follow the cyclical application of the stress rules. If these expressions have<br />

different structures, with different bracketing of constituents, then a cyclical procedure<br />

whereby rules apply within the brackets, after which the innermost brackets are deleted<br />

and the rules apply again, will achieve the desired results. On each cycle, primary stress<br />

is assigned, automatically reducing other levels by 1:<br />

[[[black] [board]] [eraser]]<br />

Cycle 1 [1] [1] [1]

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!