25.04.2013 Views

Limitation of Actions Consultation - Law Commission

Limitation of Actions Consultation - Law Commission

Limitation of Actions Consultation - Law Commission

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

(2) <strong>Actions</strong> for Contribution under the Civil Liability (Contribution) Act<br />

1978<br />

(a) Section 1 <strong>of</strong> the Civil Liability Contribution Act 1978 (“the 1978 Act”)<br />

7.22 An action under section 1 <strong>of</strong> the 1978 Act must comply with the requirements <strong>of</strong><br />

both the 1980 Act and the provisions <strong>of</strong> the 1978 Act affecting the limitation<br />

period. Under section 1 <strong>of</strong> the 1978 Act, an action to recover a contribution may<br />

be brought even though the defendant has ceased to be liable for the damages for<br />

which he seeks the contribution (for example, because <strong>of</strong> the expiry <strong>of</strong> a limitation<br />

period barring the remedy), provided that the defendant was so liable immediately<br />

before he was ordered (or agreed) to pay the damages. 51<br />

However, an action<br />

against the potential contributor will be barred if the contributor has ceased to be<br />

liable in respect <strong>of</strong> the damage for which the contribution is sought because <strong>of</strong> the<br />

expiry <strong>of</strong> a limitation period which extinguished the right <strong>of</strong> the plaintiff (rather<br />

than simply barring the remedy). 52<br />

(b) Section 10 <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Limitation</strong> Act 1980<br />

7.23 By section 10(1) <strong>of</strong> the 1980 Act, the limitation period for an action by a<br />

defendant to recover a contribution under section 1 <strong>of</strong> the 1978 Act towards any<br />

damages he or she is liable to pay (whether upon judgment or upon settlement <strong>of</strong><br />

a dispute) is two years from the date on which the right to bring the action<br />

accrued.<br />

7.24 The date on which the right accrued is decided in accordance with the provisions<br />

<strong>of</strong> sections 10(3) and 10(4). Under section 10(3), where the contribution is<br />

sought in respect <strong>of</strong> damages awarded by a judgment or an arbitration award, the<br />

relevant date is the date <strong>of</strong> the judgment or award. Section 10(3) also provides<br />

that no account is to be taken <strong>of</strong> a judgment or award made on appeal which<br />

varies the amount <strong>of</strong> the damages awarded against the defendant. In consequence,<br />

where the defendant is found liable to pay damages by a court <strong>of</strong> first instance, the<br />

limitation period will run from the date <strong>of</strong> that judgment, whether or not an appeal<br />

court later reduces or increases the amount <strong>of</strong> damages the defendant is liable to<br />

pay. Where the defendant’s liability to pay damages arises only from the decision<br />

<strong>of</strong> an appeal court, the limitation period will run from the date <strong>of</strong> the appellate<br />

decision.<br />

Act 1985) was six years - the period for actions on a contract, rather than a specialty. See<br />

further K Reece-Thomas, “The section 14 Contract: <strong>Limitation</strong> Issues” (1997) 16 CJQ<br />

318.<br />

50 A case like Cork v Goode today in which the plaintiff sought a sum <strong>of</strong> money in reliance on a<br />

statute would come within s 9. Before the <strong>Limitation</strong> Act 1939 came into force, the closest<br />

equivalent to s 9 <strong>of</strong> the 1980 Act was provided by s 3 <strong>of</strong> the Civil Procedure Act 1833,<br />

applying, inter alia, to actions for “penalties, damages, or sums <strong>of</strong> money given to the party<br />

grieved by any statute”. This was interpreted as applying only in actions for penalties,<br />

rather than compensation: see Thomson v Lord Clanmorris [1900] 1 Ch 718.<br />

51 Section 1(2).<br />

52 Section 1(3).<br />

118

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!