25.04.2013 Views

Limitation of Actions Consultation - Law Commission

Limitation of Actions Consultation - Law Commission

Limitation of Actions Consultation - Law Commission

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>of</strong> money, the limitation period is 12 years from the date the cause <strong>of</strong> action<br />

accrued, on the grounds that a statute is a form <strong>of</strong> specialty. 189<br />

We have<br />

provisionally recommended that our core regime should apply to specialties 190<br />

and<br />

if our core regime were also to apply to actions for “any sum recoverable by virtue<br />

<strong>of</strong> any enactment” no distinction would be made between the two types <strong>of</strong> action.<br />

This would be advantageous because there seems no reason to differentiate<br />

between actions on a statute where the plaintiff is seeking money and those where<br />

he or she is not seeking monetary relief. 191<br />

The initial limitation period would then<br />

run from the date <strong>of</strong> discoverability <strong>of</strong> the cause <strong>of</strong> action in each case. This<br />

would vary according to the provisions <strong>of</strong> the statute providing for the action -<br />

adapting the test given in Coburn v Colledge, 192<br />

the plaintiff would need to know <strong>of</strong><br />

every fact which was necessary for the plaintiff to prove to obtain the relief sought.<br />

As under the present law, this would be a matter <strong>of</strong> statutory construction. The<br />

starting point for the long-stop period, the date <strong>of</strong> the act or omission <strong>of</strong> the<br />

defendant giving rise to the action, would also depend on the construction <strong>of</strong> the<br />

relevant statute.<br />

13.141 A further advantage <strong>of</strong> applying the core regime to actions on a statute would be<br />

that the present theoretical problem <strong>of</strong> distinguishing between actions on a statute<br />

as opposed to actions founded on simple contract or tort would no longer arise. 193<br />

We ask consultees whether they agree with our provisional<br />

recommendation that actions on a statute should be subject to our core<br />

regime. If consultees do not agree, we ask them to say why not.<br />

15 ACTIONS AGAINST PUBLIC AUTHORITIES<br />

13.142 Between 1893 and 1954, actions against public authorities were subject to shorter<br />

limitation periods than actions against other defendants. Under the terms <strong>of</strong><br />

section 1 <strong>of</strong> the Public Authorities Protection Act 1893:<br />

Where any action, prosecution or other proceeding is commenced in the<br />

United Kingdom against any person for any act done in pursuance or<br />

execution or intended execution <strong>of</strong> any Act <strong>of</strong> Parliament, or <strong>of</strong> any public<br />

duty or authority, or in respect <strong>of</strong> any alleged neglect or default in the<br />

execution <strong>of</strong> any such act duty or authority ... the action, prosecution or<br />

proceeding shall not lie or be instituted unless it is commenced within six<br />

months next after the act, neglect or default complained <strong>of</strong>, or in the case<br />

<strong>of</strong> a continuance or injury or damage, within six months next after the<br />

ceasing there<strong>of</strong>.<br />

189 Section 8 <strong>of</strong> the 1980 Act. See paras 3.1 and 7.10 - 7.11 above.<br />

190 See para 13.6 above.<br />

191 We note, for example, that the <strong>Law</strong> Reform Committee recommended in 1936 that the<br />

limitation period for all actions arising by virtue <strong>of</strong> statutory provisions should be reduced<br />

from the period applicable to specialties to six years without distinguishing between actions<br />

where the plaintiff sought payment under the enactment, and those where he or she did not.<br />

See <strong>Law</strong> Revision Committee, Fifth Interim Report (Statutes <strong>of</strong> <strong>Limitation</strong>) (1936) Cmd<br />

5334, p 9.<br />

192 [1897] 1 QB 702. See para 7.16 above.<br />

193 See paras 7.17 - 7.21 above.<br />

369

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!