25.04.2013 Views

Limitation of Actions Consultation - Law Commission

Limitation of Actions Consultation - Law Commission

Limitation of Actions Consultation - Law Commission

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

(c) that the injury, assuming liability on the part <strong>of</strong> the defendant,<br />

warrants bringing a proceeding (Province <strong>of</strong> Alberta, <strong>Limitation</strong>s<br />

Act c L-15.1 1996, section 3(1)(a)). 43<br />

(3) A claim is discovered on the earlier <strong>of</strong><br />

(a) The day on which the person with the claim first knew,<br />

(i) that the injury, loss or damage had occurred,<br />

(ii) that the injury, loss or damage was caused by or contributed<br />

to by an act or omission,<br />

(iii) that the act or omission was that <strong>of</strong> the person against<br />

whom the claim is made, and<br />

(iv) that, having regard to the nature <strong>of</strong> the injury, loss or<br />

damage, a proceeding would be an appropriate means to<br />

seek to remedy it; and<br />

(b) the day on which a reasonable person with the abilities and in the<br />

circumstances <strong>of</strong> the person with the claim first ought to have<br />

known <strong>of</strong> the matters referred to in clause (a). (Ontario <strong>Limitation</strong>s<br />

(General) Bill 1992, clause 5(1)).<br />

(4) The date on which the plaintiff first knew, or in the circumstances ought to<br />

have known, that:<br />

(a) the injury in respect <strong>of</strong> which he brings proceedings had occurred;<br />

(b) the injury was attributable to the conduct <strong>of</strong> the defendant; and<br />

(c) the injury, assuming liability on the part <strong>of</strong> the defendant, warrants<br />

bringing proceedings. (<strong>Law</strong> Reform <strong>Commission</strong> <strong>of</strong> Western<br />

Australia). 44<br />

12.29 In the light <strong>of</strong> the above proposals <strong>of</strong> other law reform bodies - and in line with the<br />

present English provisions on discoverability - we consider that the definition <strong>of</strong><br />

discoverability should focus on three main factual elements:-<br />

(1) knowledge <strong>of</strong> the facts constituting the cause <strong>of</strong> action;<br />

(2) knowledge <strong>of</strong> the identity <strong>of</strong> the defendant;<br />

(3) knowledge that the cause <strong>of</strong> action is significant.<br />

We shall look at each <strong>of</strong> the above three main factual elements <strong>of</strong> the definition in<br />

turn.<br />

43 This Act was assented to on 1 May 1996. It is not yet in force. It is based on the<br />

recommendations <strong>of</strong> the Alberta <strong>Law</strong> Reform Institute, Report No 55, <strong>Limitation</strong>s (1989).<br />

44 Report on <strong>Limitation</strong> and Notice <strong>of</strong> <strong>Actions</strong>, Project No 36 - Part II (1997) para 7.21.<br />

260

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!