25.04.2013 Views

Limitation of Actions Consultation - Law Commission

Limitation of Actions Consultation - Law Commission

Limitation of Actions Consultation - Law Commission

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

(2) Definition <strong>of</strong> the Date <strong>of</strong> Discoverability<br />

Knowledge <strong>of</strong> which facts?<br />

15.4 We ask consultees whether they agree with our provisional proposals that:<br />

(1) the definition <strong>of</strong> the date <strong>of</strong> knowledge (or date <strong>of</strong> discoverability) should<br />

focus on three main factual elements:<br />

(a) that the plaintiff has a cause <strong>of</strong> action<br />

(b) against the defendant which is<br />

(c) significant.<br />

(2) A cause <strong>of</strong> action should be regarded as significant if a person with the<br />

plaintiff’s abilities would have reasonably considered the cause <strong>of</strong> action<br />

sufficiently serious to justify instituting proceedings against the defendant,<br />

on the assumption that the defendant does not dispute liability and has the<br />

resources to meet the claim.<br />

If consultees do not agree with these provisional proposals, what proposals would<br />

they prefer? (Paragraph 12.44).<br />

What is meant by actual knowledge (<strong>of</strong> facts)?<br />

15.5 We ask consultees whether they agree with our provisional views that:<br />

(1) “actual knowledge” should be treated as a straightforward concept and<br />

should not be defined in our proposed statute.<br />

(2) the approach <strong>of</strong> the Court <strong>of</strong> Appeal in Spargo v North Essex District Health<br />

Authority 2<br />

should be supported. According to this, the courts should treat<br />

actual knowledge as a subjective concept; and a plaintiff, who so firmly<br />

believes that he or she has a significant cause <strong>of</strong> action against the<br />

defendant that he or she goes to a solicitor to seek advice about making a<br />

claim, should be regarded as having actual knowledge.<br />

(3) as under the present law, once actual knowledge has been acquired, time<br />

should run irrespective <strong>of</strong> subsequent advice to the contrary.<br />

If consultees do not agree with our provisional views we ask them to explain why<br />

not, and what alternative approach they would prefer. (Paragraph 12.49).<br />

15.6 We ask consultees whether they agree with our provisional view that it would be<br />

prudent to clarify in the proposed legislation that normal rules <strong>of</strong> agency would<br />

apply so that a plaintiff would be taken to have his or her agent’s actual knowledge<br />

<strong>of</strong> information acquired within the agent’s authority to act for the plaintiff.<br />

(Paragraph 12.51).<br />

2 [1997] PIQR P235.<br />

401

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!