25.04.2013 Views

Limitation of Actions Consultation - Law Commission

Limitation of Actions Consultation - Law Commission

Limitation of Actions Consultation - Law Commission

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

expiry <strong>of</strong> the time limit; whether negotiations between the parties started before<br />

the expiry <strong>of</strong> the time limit; whether the estate has been distributed; and whether a<br />

refusal to extend the time would leave the plaintiff without redress against<br />

anybody.<br />

(iv) Discrimination Acts 61<br />

7.31 The Sex Discrimination Act 1975, the Race Relations Act 1976 and the Disability<br />

Discrimination Act 1995 contain a framework <strong>of</strong> time limits, within which the<br />

various available types <strong>of</strong> enforcement action must be taken. For example, a<br />

complaint relating to employment discrimination must be made to an industrial<br />

tribunal within three months after the act complained <strong>of</strong> was done. 62<br />

Civil<br />

proceedings must be brought in the courts in relation to discrimination in areas<br />

other than employment within six months <strong>of</strong> the act complained <strong>of</strong>. 63<br />

7.32 These Acts provide that the court or tribunal may consider a complaint, claim or<br />

application made to it out <strong>of</strong> time if “in all the circumstances <strong>of</strong> the case, it<br />

considers that it is just and equitable to do so”. 64<br />

In Foster v South Glamorgan<br />

Health Authority 65<br />

Popplewell J, giving the judgment <strong>of</strong> the Employment Appeal<br />

Tribunal, noted that it is the practice <strong>of</strong> the industrial tribunals and the<br />

Employment Appeal Tribunal to apply the limitation periods with great strictness<br />

and to limit the circumstances in which an extension will be granted. In that case,<br />

the applicant brought a claim under the Sex Discrimination Act 1975 that there<br />

had been an act <strong>of</strong> sex discrimination because she had been obliged to retire at the<br />

age <strong>of</strong> 60, where a man could have worked until 65. As the law appeared when<br />

she retired, she had no claim. After the case <strong>of</strong> Marshall v Southampton and South<br />

61 Different time limits apply under the Equal Pay Act 1970. A reference may only be made to<br />

an industrial tribunal under the 1970 Act (other than a reference by a court under s 2(3)) if<br />

the employee concerned has been employed under the relevant contract during the six<br />

months prior to the reference, (s 2(4)) and awards are limited to arrears <strong>of</strong> remuneration or<br />

damages in respect <strong>of</strong> the two years up to the institution <strong>of</strong> proceedings (s 2(5)). There is<br />

no discretion to disapply the time limit or accept references out <strong>of</strong> time. Where, by virtue <strong>of</strong><br />

European Community law, employees have rights under the 1970 Act but the existence <strong>of</strong><br />

the rights is only discovered later, Community law will not override the time limits in<br />

sections 2(4) and (5) to allow them to be enforced: Preston v Wolverhampton Healthcare NHS<br />

Trust [1997] IRLR 233 (CA), which concerned equality <strong>of</strong> pension rights.<br />

62 Sex Discrimination Act 1975, s 76(1); Race Relations Act 1976, s 68(1); Disability<br />

Discrimination Act 1995, s 8(8) and Sch 3, Part I, para 3(1). See General Medical Council v<br />

Rovenska, The Times, 31 December 1996 (CA).<br />

63 Sex Discrimination Act 1975, s 76(2)(a); Race Relations Act 1976, s 68(2)(a); Disability<br />

Discrimination Act 1995, s 25(6) and Sch 3, Part II, para 6. In race and sex discrimination<br />

cases relating to public sector education, the time period is eight months: Sex<br />

Discrimination Act 1975, s 76(2)(b); Race Relations Act 1976, s 68(2)(b). In Cannon v<br />

Barnsley MBC [1992] IRLR 474 (EAT), it was held that a directly effective European<br />

Community law right arising under the (incorrectly implemented) Equal Treatment<br />

Directive, 76/207/EEC, did not come under s 76(1).<br />

64 Sex Discrimination Act 1975, s 76(5); Race Relations Act 1976, s 68(6); Disability<br />

Discrimination Act 1995 s 8(8) and Sch 3, Part I, para 3(2) and s 25(6) and Sch 3, Part II,<br />

para 6(3).<br />

65 [1988] ICR 526, 528 (EAT).<br />

121

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!