25.04.2013 Views

Limitation of Actions Consultation - Law Commission

Limitation of Actions Consultation - Law Commission

Limitation of Actions Consultation - Law Commission

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

trustee <strong>of</strong> the “self-dealing” and “fair dealing” rules, and for dishonestly<br />

assisting or procuring a breach <strong>of</strong> fiduciary duty, in so far as these do not<br />

constitute a breach <strong>of</strong> trust.<br />

13.105 We similarly consider that the core regime should be applied to claims against<br />

personal representatives claiming a share in a deceased person’s estate. At present,<br />

unless the facts are such that section 21(1) <strong>of</strong> the 1980 Act applies, 133<br />

the<br />

limitation period in relation to a claim to the personal estate <strong>of</strong> a deceased person<br />

or to any share or interest in the estate, is twelve years from the date on which the<br />

right to receive the share or interest accrued (that is, from the date <strong>of</strong> the death). 134<br />

We take the view that this period is too long, when applied to all claims for legacies<br />

or shares in an estate, and believe that the core regime should apply, as it should to<br />

breaches <strong>of</strong> trust. We consider that doing so would result in limitation periods<br />

which would be fair, both from the point <strong>of</strong> view <strong>of</strong> the beneficiary and from that<br />

<strong>of</strong> the personal representative (or other defendant). We see no reason why, once a<br />

beneficiary is able to discover the existence <strong>of</strong> a claim, he or she should not be<br />

expected to commence proceedings within the three years which the core regime<br />

would provide. The long-stop <strong>of</strong> ten years would run from the breach <strong>of</strong> duty by<br />

the personal representatives.<br />

13.106 For similar reasons, we take the view that the core regime should be applied to<br />

claims against an estate for arrears <strong>of</strong> interest on a legacy, for which the limitation<br />

period is currently six years from the date on which the interest became due. 135<br />

13.107 As well as being fair, application <strong>of</strong> the core regime would have other advantages.<br />

For example, it would eliminate the need, which has sometimes been problematic,<br />

to decide whether the persons against whom the claim is brought are acting as<br />

personal representatives or as trustees. 136<br />

13.108 We ask consultees whether they agree with our provisional view that the<br />

core regime should apply to actions in respect <strong>of</strong> the personal estate <strong>of</strong> a<br />

deceased person (including any claims to arrears <strong>of</strong> interest on legacies).<br />

11 ACTIONS TO RECOVER LAND AND RELATED ACTIONS<br />

(1) Introduction<br />

13.109 <strong>Actions</strong> to recover land are currently governed by a separate limitations regime to<br />

other actions. The general rule provides for a limitation period <strong>of</strong> twelve years, 137<br />

which starts from the time when the plaintiff’s right <strong>of</strong> action accrued. This will<br />

133 That is, fraudulent breaches <strong>of</strong> trust (section 21(1)(a)), and actions to recover trust<br />

property or its proceeds from the trustee (section 21(1)(b)), in which case there is no<br />

limitation period: see paras 4.14 - 4.23 above.<br />

134 See para 4.33 above.<br />

135 See para 4.33 above.<br />

136 See para 4.35 above.<br />

137 Extended to thirty or sixty years in certain circumstances. See paras 6.42 - 6.44 above.<br />

357

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!