25.04.2013 Views

Limitation of Actions Consultation - Law Commission

Limitation of Actions Consultation - Law Commission

Limitation of Actions Consultation - Law Commission

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

actions under Order 15, rule 1(2) <strong>of</strong> the County Court Rules). Order 15, rule 6 is<br />

relevant where there is an application to add or substitute a new party to the<br />

action. Order 20, rule 5 applies where the plaintiff wishes to amend the writ, or<br />

In this paragraph “any relevant period <strong>of</strong> limitation” means a time limit under the<br />

<strong>Limitation</strong> Act 1980 or a time limit which applies to the proceedings in question by virtue<br />

<strong>of</strong> the Foreign <strong>Limitation</strong> Periods Act 1984.<br />

Rule 6(6) Except in a case to which the law <strong>of</strong> another country relating to limitation<br />

applies, and the law <strong>of</strong> England and Wales does not so apply, the addition or substitution <strong>of</strong><br />

a new party shall be treated as necessary for the purposes <strong>of</strong> paragraph (5)(a) if, and only if,<br />

the Court is satisfied that -<br />

83 Rule 5(1)<br />

(a) the new party is a necessary party to the action in that property is vested in him at<br />

law or in equity and the plaintiff’s claim in respect <strong>of</strong> an equitable interest in that<br />

property is liable to be defeated unless the new party is joined, or<br />

(b) the relevant cause <strong>of</strong> action is vested in the new party and the plaintiff jointly but not<br />

severally, or<br />

(c) the new party is the Attorney General and the proceedings should have been brought<br />

by relator proceedings in his name, or<br />

(d) the new party is a company in which the plaintiff is a shareholder and on whose<br />

behalf the plaintiff is suing to enforce a right vested in the company, or<br />

(e) the new party is sued jointly with the defendant and is not also liable severally with<br />

him and failure to join the new party might render the claim unenforceable.<br />

Subject to O 15, rr 6, 7, and 8 and the following provisions <strong>of</strong> this rule, the Court may at<br />

any stage <strong>of</strong> the proceedings allow the plaintiff to amend his writ, or any party to amend<br />

his pleading, on such terms as to costs or otherwise as may be just and in such manner<br />

(if any) as it may direct.<br />

Rule 5(2)<br />

Where an application to the Court for leave to make the amendment mentioned in<br />

paragraph (3), (4) or (5) is made after any relevant period <strong>of</strong> limitation current at the<br />

date <strong>of</strong> issue <strong>of</strong> the writ has expired, the Court may nevertheless grant such leave in the<br />

circumstances mentioned in that paragraph if it thinks it just to do so.<br />

In this paragraph “any relevant period <strong>of</strong> limitation” includes a time limit which applies<br />

to the proceedings in question by virtue <strong>of</strong> the Foreign <strong>Limitation</strong> Periods Act 1984.<br />

Rule 5(3)<br />

An amendment to correct the name <strong>of</strong> a party may be allowed under paragraph (2)<br />

notwithstanding that is it alleged that the effect <strong>of</strong> the amendment will be to substitute a<br />

new party if the Court is satisfied that the mistake sought to be corrected was a genuine<br />

mistake and was not misleading or such as to cause any reasonable doubt as to the<br />

identity <strong>of</strong> the party intending to sue or, as the case may be, intended to be sued.<br />

Rule 5(4)<br />

An amendment to alter the capacity in which a party sues may be allowed under<br />

paragraph (2) if the new capacity is one which that party had at the date <strong>of</strong> the<br />

commencement <strong>of</strong> the proceedings or has since acquired.<br />

Rule 5(5)<br />

An amendment may be allowed under paragraph (2) notwithstanding that the effect <strong>of</strong><br />

the amendment will be to add or substitute a new cause <strong>of</strong> action if the new cause <strong>of</strong><br />

action arises out <strong>of</strong> the same facts or substantially the same facts as a cause <strong>of</strong> action in<br />

respect <strong>of</strong> which relief has already been claimed in the action by the party applying for<br />

leave to make the amendment.<br />

173

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!