25.04.2013 Views

Limitation of Actions Consultation - Law Commission

Limitation of Actions Consultation - Law Commission

Limitation of Actions Consultation - Law Commission

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

ecome statute-barred once six years have elapsed after the first bona fide<br />

purchase.<br />

13.62 It would seem that our provisional preferred views could be neatly achieved by a<br />

provision relating to deliberate concealment containing wording similar, mutatis<br />

mutandis, to that in section 32(1), (3) and (4) <strong>of</strong> the 1980 Act. 91<br />

Deliberate<br />

concealment by a person would disapply the long-stop, not only in relation to<br />

actions against that person, but also against his or her successors in title, but with<br />

an exception protecting bona fide purchasers. Bona fide purchasers would be able<br />

to rely on the long stop, whilst the long-stop would be disapplied for everyone else<br />

receiving the goods, in good faith or otherwise. It would need to be provided that,<br />

for a defendant who was a bona fide purchaser <strong>of</strong> converted goods, the long-stop<br />

period would commence on the date when the defendant purchased the goods,<br />

unless the defendant could trace his or her title to the goods back to one or more<br />

previous bona fide purchasers, in which case it would commence on the date <strong>of</strong><br />

acquisition by the first <strong>of</strong> those purchasers.<br />

Example D1 steals a painting from P in 2000. He then hides it and sells it on<br />

to D2, who knows that it is stolen, in 2011. D2 sells it to D3, who does not know<br />

that it is stolen, in 2012. D3 sells it to D4, another bona fide purchaser, in 2013. P<br />

discovers 92<br />

D1’s identity in 2023, D2’s identity in 2024, D3’s identity in 2025 and<br />

D4’s identity in 2026. The long-stop period for an action against both D1 and D2<br />

will be disapplied by virtue <strong>of</strong> D1’s, and perhaps D2’s, deliberate concealment <strong>of</strong><br />

their identity, and D2 will not be entitled to claim the “bona fide purchaser”<br />

exception. The limitation period for a claim against D1 will therefore be three<br />

years from P’s date <strong>of</strong> knowledge with regard to D1, ending in 2026, and the<br />

limitation period for a claim against D2 will be three years from P’s date <strong>of</strong><br />

knowledge with regard to D2, ending in 2027. Since D3 and D4 are both bona<br />

fide purchasers, D1’s deliberate concealment will not disapply the long stop. This<br />

will run for 10 years from 2012. 93<br />

13.63 We ask consultees whether they agree with our provisional views that<br />

where goods have been stolen:-<br />

(a) The long-stop period should apply in relation to actions for<br />

conversion against bona fide purchasers <strong>of</strong> the goods, and that the<br />

long-stop period should commence on the date <strong>of</strong> the purchase or,<br />

where there has been more than one purchase, on the date <strong>of</strong> the<br />

first bona fide purchase.<br />

(b) The long-stop period should be disapplied in relation to actions<br />

for conversion against anyone other than bona fide purchasers <strong>of</strong><br />

the goods.<br />

91 See paras 8.23 - 8.24 above.<br />

92 It is assumed that P has not acquired constructive knowledge, and has actual knowledge <strong>of</strong><br />

all other relevant facts, including (at least where delivery up <strong>of</strong> the painting is sought) the<br />

location <strong>of</strong> the painting.<br />

93 So it will have expired before P discovers that the property has been in D3’s and D4’s<br />

possession.<br />

345

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!