25.04.2013 Views

Limitation of Actions Consultation - Law Commission

Limitation of Actions Consultation - Law Commission

Limitation of Actions Consultation - Law Commission

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

time, and that no-one had already taken possession by virtue <strong>of</strong> the future interest<br />

claimed. 18<br />

Where the person entitled to the preceding interest in the land (other<br />

than a term <strong>of</strong> years absolute) was not in possession at the date when that interest<br />

determined (so that a right <strong>of</strong> action accrued to that person before the<br />

determination <strong>of</strong> his or her interest), the limitation period will be:<br />

(1) twelve years from the date the right <strong>of</strong> action accrued to the person entitled<br />

to the preceding interest; or<br />

(2) six years from the date on which the right <strong>of</strong> action accrued to the person<br />

entitled to the succeeding interest<br />

whichever period expires last. 19<br />

6.11 This provision does not, however, apply in the case <strong>of</strong> any estate or interest which<br />

falls into possession on the determination <strong>of</strong> an entailed interest and which might<br />

have been barred by the person entitled to the entailed interest. 20<br />

In those<br />

circumstances, time will run against a person entitled in remainder, even though<br />

he or she may have no entitlement to possession <strong>of</strong> the land during the limitation<br />

period. 21<br />

6.12 Where the plaintiff has both a present and a future interest in land, and his right to<br />

bring an action to recover the present interest has become time-barred, he may not<br />

bring an action to recover the future interest unless in the meantime someone has<br />

recovered possession <strong>of</strong> the land under an intermediate interest. 22<br />

(c) Leases and tenancies<br />

6.13 The general rule relating to future interests also applies to leases, so that the<br />

landlord’s cause <strong>of</strong> action will accrue when its reversion falls into possession<br />

through the determination <strong>of</strong> the preceding interest, 23<br />

that is, on the termination <strong>of</strong><br />

the lease. 24<br />

This will apply to recovery <strong>of</strong> the land, both from the tenant, and from<br />

18 Schedule 1, para 4. The same general rule also applies to leases: see para 6.13 below. Where<br />

someone entitled to the future interest has already taken possession <strong>of</strong> the land it seems to<br />

be implicit that if the possession was unlawful the cause <strong>of</strong> action would accrue when that<br />

possession was taken, and if it was lawful it would accrue when the possession ended: see A<br />

McGee, <strong>Limitation</strong> Periods (2nd ed 1994), p 183.<br />

19 Section 15(2). So, eg, if P1 is tenant for life <strong>of</strong> settled land, remainder to P2, and D starts<br />

squatting on part <strong>of</strong> the land in 1990, then P1 must commence proceedings to recover the<br />

land by 2002. If P1 dies in 1991, P2’s right <strong>of</strong> action accrues in 1991, and P2 has until<br />

2002 to commence proceedings. If, on the other hand, P1 dies in 2000, P2’s limitation<br />

period will end in 2006.<br />

20 Section 15(3). See para 6.9 above in relation to the barring <strong>of</strong> entails.<br />

21 See R E Megarry and H W R Wade, The <strong>Law</strong> <strong>of</strong> Real Property (5th ed 1984), p 1037.<br />

22 Section 15(5).<br />

23 Section 15(2). But see para 6.16 below, in relation to the situation where rent is wrongfully<br />

received by a third party.<br />

24 Chadwick v Broadwood (1840) 3 Beav 308; 49 ER 121.<br />

96

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!