25.04.2013 Views

Limitation of Actions Consultation - Law Commission

Limitation of Actions Consultation - Law Commission

Limitation of Actions Consultation - Law Commission

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

3.82 The basic provision is section 12 <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Limitation</strong> Act 1980 which is largely<br />

analogous to the provisions for actions for personal injuries <strong>of</strong> section 11. By<br />

section 12(2) no action under the Fatal Accidents Act can be brought after the<br />

expiration <strong>of</strong> three years from the date <strong>of</strong> death or the date <strong>of</strong> knowledge <strong>of</strong> the<br />

person for whose benefit the action is brought, whichever is the later. Knowledge<br />

here has the same meaning as it has when applied to an action for personal injury<br />

by the injured plaintiff. 184<br />

If there is more than one dependant then the issue <strong>of</strong> the<br />

date <strong>of</strong> knowledge under section 12 is applied separately to each <strong>of</strong> them. 185<br />

Thus<br />

it is possible for a number <strong>of</strong> different limitation periods to be operating.<br />

3.83 Under section 12(3) <strong>of</strong> the 1980 Act, sections 28 (extension <strong>of</strong> limitation period in<br />

the case <strong>of</strong> disability), 33 (exclusion <strong>of</strong> limitation period), 35 (new claims in<br />

pending actions) and 39 (if another limitation period is set by another enactment<br />

the limitation period under section 12(2) will not apply) apply to actions under the<br />

1976 Act. Where a dependant applies to the court for the period set by section<br />

12(2) to be excluded under section 33, section 33(5) provides that the criteria set<br />

out in section 33(3) 186<br />

“shall have effect with appropriate modifications, and shall<br />

have effect in particular as if references to the plaintiff included references to any<br />

person whose date <strong>of</strong> knowledge is or was relevant in determining a time limit”.<br />

3.84 Section 12(1) <strong>of</strong> the 1980 Act provides that an action under the Fatal Accidents<br />

Act 1976 “shall not be brought if the death occurred when the person injured<br />

could no longer maintain an action and recover damages in respect <strong>of</strong> the injury<br />

(whether because <strong>of</strong> a time limit in this Act or any other Act, or for any other<br />

reason).” When deciding whether the deceased could still maintain an action it is<br />

not permissible to take into account the possibility that the limitation period could<br />

have been excluded under section 33. But although no account can be taken <strong>of</strong><br />

the possibility that the deceased may have made a successful section 33 claim,<br />

section 33(6) provides that the court may exclude the operation <strong>of</strong> section 12(1) <strong>of</strong><br />

the 1980 Act and section 1 <strong>of</strong> the Fatal Accidents Act 1976. In exercising that<br />

discretion the court, pursuant to section 33(4), must have regard in particular to<br />

the length <strong>of</strong>, and reasons for, the delay on the part <strong>of</strong> the deceased. Although not<br />

specifically required to do so, the court will also consider the prejudice to the<br />

defendant caused by any further delay on the part <strong>of</strong> the dependants.<br />

3.85 It is worthwhile pointing out here that the decision in Stubbings v Webb, 187<br />

which<br />

we have discussed in detail above, can also lead to odd inconsistency where the<br />

184 See s 14 and the discussion above at paras 3.38 - 3.65.<br />

185 Section 13(1). Section 13(2) provides that, if the effect <strong>of</strong> subsection 1 is that the action<br />

would be outside the limitation period for some dependants but not all, the court shall<br />

direct that any person as regards whom the action would be outside that limit shall be<br />

excluded from those for whom the action is brought. The Court will not give that direction,<br />

however, if it is shown that, if the action were brought exclusively for the benefit <strong>of</strong> the<br />

person in question, it would not be defeated by a defence <strong>of</strong> limitation (whether in<br />

consequence <strong>of</strong> s 28 <strong>of</strong> the Act or an agreement between the parties not to raise the<br />

defence, or otherwise): s 13(3). Arguably the court should not give a direction under s<br />

13(2) unless it has also decided it will not exclude the limitation period under s 33. See MA<br />

Jones, <strong>Limitation</strong> Periods in Personal Injury <strong>Actions</strong> (1995), p 176.<br />

186 See further paras 3.66 - 3.75 above.<br />

187 [1993] AC 498. See paras 3.32 - 3.35 above.<br />

57

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!