25.04.2013 Views

Pvn H,i I'UitlS

Pvn H,i I'UitlS

Pvn H,i I'UitlS

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

LASJEA. 217<br />

Genus III. LAS^E'A*, Leach. PL V. f. 2.<br />

Body oval : mantle folded on the anterior side (being the<br />

longer and larger end of the shell), so as to form a wide, but<br />

short and<br />

incomplete, incurrent tube : the excurrent tube is very<br />

inconspicuous, placed on the opposite side : foot long, tongue-<br />

shaped, protruding when in motion through<br />

current tube at its base.<br />

Shell roundish-oval : beaks straight :<br />

a slit in the ex-<br />

cartilage long and<br />

cylindrical, divided or split lengthwise, and clasping the<br />

hinge-plate, in each valve, on the smaller and narrower side<br />

of the shell, being the posterior end : hinge containing in the<br />

left valve a minute thorn-like cardinal tooth, and in each<br />

valve two remarkably strong lateral teeth.<br />

The late Captain Brown proposed this genus in 1827,<br />

on the authority of Dr. Leach, for the Cardium rubrum<br />

and although he says nothing about the<br />

of Montagu ;<br />

animal, and not much more about the shell, I think the<br />

genus is a good one, and I therefore adopt the name<br />

above given to it. M. Recluz, apparently unaware of<br />

his having been anticipated, gave in 1843 another name<br />

(Poronia) to the same genus; but his description is<br />

positively incorrect. He says of the animal, that it has<br />

on the posterior side two lobes, and two tubes which are<br />

disunited ;<br />

and of the shell, that the hinge has two cardi-<br />

nal teeth in each valve, besides lateral teeth, and that<br />

the cartilage is placed in an oblique groove. It will be<br />

seen that my description of the generic<br />

characters is<br />

very different from that of M. Recluz : and were it not<br />

for the certainty that we both mean not only the same<br />

genus, but also the same species, I could not believe<br />

that our respective descriptions had been drawn from<br />

the same object. The present genus is intermediate<br />

between Montacuta and Kellia, and partakes of the<br />

* A meaningless name ;<br />

little shield.<br />

possibly a corrupt derivation from Xaiai)iov, s

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!