05.05.2013 Views

View/Open - ResearchSpace - University of KwaZulu-Natal

View/Open - ResearchSpace - University of KwaZulu-Natal

View/Open - ResearchSpace - University of KwaZulu-Natal

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Soil sampling and analysis<br />

The first number <strong>of</strong> the assessment has a value from 1 to 3; 1 being non-saline, 2<br />

potentially saline and 3 saline. The second number has a value from 4 to 6; 4 being<br />

non-sodic, 5 potentially sodic and 6 sodic. A sodic soil is defined as a soil with a low<br />

soluble salt content and a high exchangeable sodium percentage (ESP), with a usual<br />

ESP > 15 (SOIL CLASSIFICATION WORKING GROUP, 1991). A code 1,4 soil is<br />

described as suitable for irrigation, a code 2,5 soil as poorly drained and not suitable<br />

for irrigation and a code 3,6 soil as not suitable for irrigation.<br />

A pH test and a water content test were done on both samples. The pH <strong>of</strong> three<br />

different replicate samples was measured. Soil was mixed 1:1 (v/v) with water and<br />

homogenized with a stirrer apparatus. After about an hour the soil samples were<br />

vacuum filtered through Whatman No.1 filter papers and their pH was measured. The<br />

water content was calculated by weighing the soil, placing the soil in a drying oven<br />

set at 110°C and then subtracting the mass after no weight loss could be observed<br />

from the initial weight.<br />

3.3 RESULTS<br />

The colour <strong>of</strong> the two samples suggests that the drainage conditions <strong>of</strong> sample 1 is<br />

superior to that <strong>of</strong> sample 2 (DONAHUE et al., 1983) (Figure 3.1). Sample 1 also had<br />

more leaf and root material than sample 2, suggesting that it has more organic<br />

matter, and therefore a higher nutrient content, than sample 2 (DONAHUE et al.,<br />

1983). It is notable that sample 2 appears more aggregated and dense.<br />

94

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!