06.05.2013 Views

View/Open - University of Zululand Institutional Repository

View/Open - University of Zululand Institutional Repository

View/Open - University of Zululand Institutional Repository

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Note: (i)<br />

(ii)<br />

(iii)<br />

(iv)<br />

(v)<br />

284<br />

The cost <strong>of</strong> supplying the infrastructure ratio (excluding certain<br />

services and the cost <strong>of</strong> the land) in 1989, using Option 1 as a<br />

baseline and assuming the highest level <strong>of</strong> services for each option,<br />

was approximately as follows 1 : 1,42: 1,67: 2,19: 3,74: 4,14.<br />

Actual costs will depend on site and other conditions.<br />

VIP refers to Ventilated Improved Pit toilets (latrines!. while VIDP<br />

refers to Ventilated Improved Double Pit latrines.<br />

The various services are not fixed for a given option and different<br />

combinations <strong>of</strong> services are possible. The development options<br />

accordingly, are a guide only.<br />

The assumed density is 20 - 25 residential sites ha- 1 .<br />

The 1989 selling price <strong>of</strong> infrastructure per residential site less than<br />

750 m 2 in proclaimed townships on (former) South African<br />

Development Trust land and in KwaZulu was as follows:<br />

Pillar taps, pit latrines and roads (graded only)<br />

Pillar taps, pit latrines and gravel roads<br />

Water, pit latrines and gravel roads<br />

Pillar taps, sewerage and gravel roads<br />

Water, sewerage and gravel roads<br />

Water, sewerage and tarred roads<br />

R 600<br />

R1200<br />

R1200<br />

R1300<br />

R1400<br />

R2400<br />

(vi) Option 4 (metered standpipe/pillar tap on individual sites) is not<br />

generally recommended, but should be allowed as an upgrading<br />

option, if accompanied by a properly designed facility for the disposal<br />

<strong>of</strong> wastewater. The upgrading <strong>of</strong> an area from Options 1 - 3 to<br />

Option 4 is considered feasible. For design purposes, assume that<br />

50% <strong>of</strong> such areas will ultimately consist <strong>of</strong> Options 1 - 3, and that<br />

the remainder will upgrade to Option 4. Design however, does not<br />

allow for upgrading from Options 1 - 4 to Options 5 - 6.<br />

(vii) Further reference should be made to the Blue book, namely,<br />

Anonymous, 1983. Guidelines for the provision <strong>of</strong> engineering<br />

services for residential townships, Department <strong>of</strong> Community<br />

Development, Pretoria, various pages (Part F - water supply), and to<br />

the Green book, namely, Anonymous, 1988. Towards guidelines for<br />

services and amenities in developing communities, Department <strong>of</strong><br />

Development Aid, Pretoria, various pages. See also Footnote (iv) <strong>of</strong><br />

Table L8.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!