14.05.2013 Views

Galdós - Amazon Web Services

Galdós - Amazon Web Services

Galdós - Amazon Web Services

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Anales galdosianos [Publicaciones periódicas]. Año XII, 1977<br />

root problem for critics. If he is autonomous, who made him that way? Who gave him his name? How<br />

can he be autonomous and such a perfect little bourgeois? Doesn't the structure of illusion within an<br />

illusion simply amount to fabrication? The problem is worth discussing.<br />

But whether or not Máximo is autonomous -namely, free by appearances- is secondary to the illusion<br />

that he is. Though proportionately in greater view, the human disposition of Máximo Manso is always<br />

subservient to his fictional substance. The readers who fail to perceive that fact have ignored or<br />

forgotten the first chapter and many details of the narration. They have accepted all too readily<br />

Manso's invitation, « Vedme con apariencia humana » (1, 2), and disregarded with equal alacrity<br />

his admonition that he speaks without possession of a voice and writes though he has no hands. The<br />

narrative trick that makes Máximo appear transcendentally conscious of his fictionality and therefore<br />

not to be <strong>Galdós</strong>' creation makes the novel appear to be Máximo's creation. El amigo Manso is<br />

therefore a metanovel -a novel that investigates the nature of the novel, art about art. The autonomous<br />

-or supposedly autonomous- character in El amigo Manso raises not so much the question of <strong>Galdós</strong>'<br />

bold novelistic technique in this particular work (a major concern of the critics who have paused<br />

to comment on the device), but the whole broad problem of fiction, its birth, the relationship of its<br />

constitutive elements, its power, and its immortality 127 . <strong>Galdós</strong>' novel strikes beyond its evident link<br />

with Don Quijote to display the artistic self-consciousness that is so very much a twentieth-century<br />

phenomenon.<br />

Lest El amigo Manso be taken as a momentary aberration, a measure of <strong>Galdós</strong>' whimsicality in<br />

1882, it is well to recall that throughout his career he made manifest directly within his novels his<br />

preoccupation with the creative process. In the last chapter of Fortunata y Jacinta , in the funeral<br />

scene, one sentence stands out for its bizarre timbre in the context of a mimetic narrative: « En el<br />

largo trayecto de la Cava al cementerio, que era uno de los del Sur, Segismundo contó al buen Ponce<br />

todo lo que sabía de la historia de Fortunata, que no era poco, sin omitir lo último, que era, sin duda<br />

lo mejor; a lo que dijo el eximio sentenciador de obras literarias que había allí elementos para un<br />

drama o novela, aunque, a su parecer, el tejido artístico no resultaría vistoso sino introduciendo ciertas<br />

urdimbres de todo punto necesarias para que la vulgaridad de la vida pudiese convertirse en materia<br />

127 One is tempted to agree with José F. Montesinos' apparent hyperbole: « Nunca como en<br />

esta novela irónica ha comprendido el escritor tan claramente el sentido de su actividad creadora<br />

» ( <strong>Galdós</strong> , II [Madrid: Castalia, 1969], p. 29), but precisely because in the context of our discussion,<br />

the statement -ironically- is not hyperbolic at all.<br />

92

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!