05.06.2013 Views

DOE/ORO/2327 Oak Ridge Reservation Annual Site Environmental ...

DOE/ORO/2327 Oak Ridge Reservation Annual Site Environmental ...

DOE/ORO/2327 Oak Ridge Reservation Annual Site Environmental ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Site</strong> <strong>Environmental</strong> Report<br />

Aquatic Resource Alteration Permit or because they had a footprint of greater than 1 acre.<br />

(Construction areas that are part of CERCLA remediation follow substantive requirements of the<br />

appropriate water pollution control permits, but are not required to obtain official permit coverage). Three<br />

of these sites were inspected in 2009 to evaluate overall effectiveness of the best management practices in<br />

use. In general, while some short-term impacts to receiving streams may have been noted, no long-term<br />

adverse impacts were observed.<br />

NPDES outfall drainage areas were also inspected twice in 2009. Land use within drainage areas is<br />

typical of office/industrial settings with surface features including laboratories, support facilities, paved<br />

areas, and grassy lawns. Outdoor material storage is most prevalent in the 7000 Area on the east end of<br />

the main ORNL facility (where most of the craft and maintenance shops are located), with other smaller<br />

outdoor storage areas located throughout the facility in and around loading docks and material delivery<br />

areas at laboratory and office buildings. The types of materials stored outside include metal items<br />

(sheeting, pipes, and parts); equipment awaiting use, disposal, or repair; construction material; and de-icer<br />

product. Flaking paint on some buildings (slated to be dismantled in the near future) also poses a potential<br />

mobile storm water pollutant source.<br />

Some construction activities are performed by third-party contractors working as tenants under<br />

agreement with other local, state, and federal agencies on the <strong>DOE</strong> reservation. There are mechanisms in<br />

place for ensuring effective storm water controls at these third-party sites, one of which includes staff<br />

from UT-Battelle acting as points-of-contact for communication interface on environmental,<br />

spill/emergency response, and other key issues.<br />

Instream locations identified under the WQPP were monitored twice in 2009 in storm conditions. A<br />

more detailed description of the WQPP wet-weather monitoring scenario can be found in Sect. 5.5.6.<br />

5.5.8 Biological Monitoring<br />

Bioaccumulation Studies<br />

The bioaccumulation task for the BMAP addresses two NPDES permit requirements at ORNL:<br />

(1) evaluate whether mercury at the site is contributing to a stream at a level that will impact fish and<br />

aquatic life or violate the recreational criteria and (2) monitor the status of PCB contamination in fish<br />

tissue in the WOC watershed.<br />

Mercury in Water. In continuation of a monitoring effort initiated in 1997, bimonthly water samples<br />

were collected from WOC at four sites in 2009. Stream conditions were selected to be representative of<br />

seasonal base-flow conditions (dry weather, clear flow) based on historical results that indicate higher<br />

mercury concentrations under these conditions.<br />

The concentration of mercury in WOC upstream from ORNL was < 5 ng/L in 2009. Long-term trends<br />

in waterborne mercury in the WOC system downstream of ORNL are shown in Fig. 5.27. Waterborne<br />

mercury downstream of ORNL declined abruptly in 2008 and remained low in 2009 as a result of<br />

rerouting highly contaminated sump water in Building 4501 to the PWTC in December 2007. The mean<br />

total mercury concentration at White <strong>Oak</strong> Creek kilometer (WCK) 4.1 was 18.6 ± 2.7 ng/L in 2009<br />

compared with 108 ± 33 ng/L in 2007. The decrease was also apparent but less pronounced at WCK 3.4,<br />

with mercury averaging 16.6 ± 2.2 ng/L in 2009 versus 49 ± 23 ng/L in 2007. In addition to being<br />

significantly lower than levels in 2007, mercury levels at these two sites were also slightly lower than in<br />

2008. A pretreatment system for the sump water started operation on October 22, 2009, which removes<br />

almost all of the mercury prior to sending the water to the PWTC. This system reduces the mercury<br />

concentration in the influent and effluent of the PWTC. Average aqueous mercury concentration at the<br />

White <strong>Oak</strong> Dam was 38.0 ± 12.7 ng/L in 2009, a level similar to results reported in recent years.<br />

Bioaccumulation in Fish. In WOC, mercury and PCB concentrations in fish are at or near human<br />

health risk thresholds (e.g., EPA ambient water quality criteria [AWQC], TDEC fish advisory limits).<br />

Mercury concentrations in fish collected in the WOC system (WCK 2.9, WCK 1.5) remained within<br />

historical ranges in 2009 (Fig. 5.34). Mercury concentrations in redbreast sunfish at WCK 3.9 (a site<br />

<strong>Oak</strong> <strong>Ridge</strong> National Laboratory 5-61

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!