05.06.2013 Views

Growth model of the reared sea urchin Paracentrotus ... - SciViews

Growth model of the reared sea urchin Paracentrotus ... - SciViews

Growth model of the reared sea urchin Paracentrotus ... - SciViews

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Choice <strong>of</strong> measurement<br />

Immersed weight is definitely <strong>the</strong> most accurate and less stressing<br />

measurement <strong>of</strong> <strong>sea</strong> <strong>urchin</strong> body size. However, it is not possible, using<br />

this method, to measure hundreds <strong>of</strong> echinoids in a reasonable period <strong>of</strong><br />

time. We thus used <strong>the</strong> test diameter, as <strong>the</strong> optimal compromise between<br />

accuracy and speed.<br />

The diameter has ano<strong>the</strong>r advantage: it is <strong>the</strong> only parameter that can<br />

be measured on very small animals <strong>of</strong> a few hundreds <strong>of</strong> microns (that is,<br />

<strong>the</strong> size <strong>of</strong> P. lividus just after metamorphosis, see Fig. 2B, p. 37). To do<br />

this, we have to kill and fix <strong>the</strong> individuals (3% glutaraldehyde) in order to<br />

manipulate <strong>the</strong>m and transfer <strong>the</strong>m on a millimeter-graduated support to be<br />

photographed. The picture is digitalized and analyzed with a custom image<br />

analysis s<strong>of</strong>tware (ShellAxis, available at http://www.sciviews.org). For a<br />

description <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> program, see Van Osselaer & Grosjean (2000) and for<br />

extensive tests <strong>of</strong> accuracy and reproducibility <strong>of</strong> measurement with this<br />

s<strong>of</strong>tware, see Van Osselaer (2001).<br />

Measuring body size with good accuracy is one aspect, knowing what<br />

it really means in terms <strong>of</strong> relative sizes <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> different organs during<br />

growth is ano<strong>the</strong>r one. Indeed, successive measurements would be really<br />

representative <strong>of</strong> somatic growth if <strong>the</strong>y were strongly correlated with<br />

growth <strong>of</strong> all somatic organs.<br />

To determine how different compartments <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>sea</strong> <strong>urchin</strong> vary with<br />

body size, a stratified sample (from 5 to 60 mm every 5 mm) <strong>of</strong> 440<br />

animals was analyzed. 220 <strong>sea</strong> <strong>urchin</strong>s were dissected in spring and 220 in<br />

autumn, which correspond to two contrasting reproductive stages in <strong>the</strong><br />

field: empty or full gonads, in order to make sure maximum variance is<br />

included in <strong>the</strong> dataset. Measurements done on each individual were:<br />

immersed weight; two perpendicular diameters at <strong>the</strong> ambitus; height; total<br />

fresh weight; fresh "drained" weight (that is, <strong>the</strong> test is opened by cutting<br />

around <strong>the</strong> ambitus and <strong>the</strong> two resulting parts are left upside down on<br />

Part II: Measurement for size in <strong>the</strong> <strong>sea</strong> <strong>urchin</strong><br />

105

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!