05.06.2013 Views

Growth model of the reared sea urchin Paracentrotus ... - SciViews

Growth model of the reared sea urchin Paracentrotus ... - SciViews

Growth model of the reared sea urchin Paracentrotus ... - SciViews

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

General conclusions<br />

GENERAL CONCLUSIONS<br />

By focusing on variability and interactions in individual growth <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

<strong>reared</strong> <strong>sea</strong> <strong>urchin</strong> <strong>Paracentrotus</strong> lividus, we raised questions on <strong>the</strong><br />

adequacy <strong>of</strong> existing <strong>model</strong>s and methods. To resolve <strong>the</strong>se problems we<br />

developed a new growth <strong>model</strong> with incorporating interspecific<br />

competition by defuzzifying a fuzzy <strong>model</strong> and a quantile regression<br />

method was adapted to account for individual variability (envelope<br />

<strong>model</strong>ling). The <strong>model</strong> appears to be an appropriate functional description<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> process, as it is in agreement with all experimental results. It allows<br />

quantifying <strong>the</strong> degree <strong>of</strong> growth inhibition in <strong>the</strong> P. lividus echinoids in<br />

cultivation.<br />

Similarly, one should question <strong>the</strong> validity <strong>of</strong> growth <strong>model</strong>s, <strong>of</strong> fitting<br />

methods and <strong>of</strong> calculation <strong>of</strong> size at age (growth ring analysis, sizefrequency<br />

data analysis, mark and recapture) in all studies on ei<strong>the</strong>r <strong>reared</strong><br />

or wild echinoids. Yet, if <strong>the</strong>re is some interaction between individuals or<br />

if individual variability is large (as both can be suspected in most if not all<br />

cases), all <strong>the</strong>se methods could lead to biased estimations <strong>of</strong> growth and,<br />

consequently, to erroneous inferences about population dynamics.<br />

Adequate tools remain to be developed for field data where age is not<br />

measurable without error. A modification <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> new <strong>model</strong> for relative<br />

growth rate data would be a logical starting point.<br />

The new <strong>model</strong> clearly has application both in <strong>sea</strong> <strong>urchin</strong> aquaculture<br />

and in fisheries management. Indeed, <strong>the</strong> experiment with mixed Ff and Fg<br />

batches (see Part III, p. 130) indicated a great growth potential <strong>of</strong> smaller,<br />

inhibited individuals in a heterogeneous population. Yield per surface unit<br />

should improve in cultivation when using mixed batches because <strong>the</strong>y are<br />

almost as productive as small plus large batches <strong>reared</strong> separately and thus,<br />

on <strong>the</strong> double <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> surface. If <strong>the</strong> mechanism <strong>of</strong> inhibition/catch up<br />

growth also occurs in <strong>the</strong> field, a bimodal size distribution could be <strong>the</strong><br />

most efficient configuration to maintain a wild population <strong>of</strong> <strong>sea</strong> <strong>urchin</strong>s.<br />

When <strong>the</strong> largest fraction <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> population is harvested, some mid-sized<br />

181

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!