Growth model of the reared sea urchin Paracentrotus ... - SciViews
Growth model of the reared sea urchin Paracentrotus ... - SciViews
Growth model of the reared sea urchin Paracentrotus ... - SciViews
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
General conclusions<br />
<strong>model</strong>s obviously belong to a more general family where metabolic time tM<br />
is a function <strong>of</strong> time t as well as several o<strong>the</strong>r environmental<br />
(meta)variables [von Bertal. with tM = f(t, xi…)].<br />
There are perhaps o<strong>the</strong>r unidentified sub-groups. The Weibull <strong>model</strong> is<br />
a generalization <strong>of</strong> von Bertalanffy 1 with an exponent applied to time t.<br />
As such, it could belong to both <strong>the</strong> dimensional and <strong>the</strong> metabolic time<br />
sub-groups. We do not see any functional meaning <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>m, but it could<br />
exist. A generalized logisitic <strong>model</strong> was proposed by Nelder (1961) and<br />
Turner et al (1969). It is a logistic function where an additional parameter<br />
m is applied as a global exponent. From its analytic form, it is a<br />
dimensional <strong>model</strong>, which makes sense only when it is applied to<br />
individual growth. Turner (1969) indicates that, when applied to<br />
populations, this <strong>model</strong> accounts for growth with a maximum population<br />
size that is allowed to vary. It this context, it may belong to ano<strong>the</strong>r<br />
unidentified sub-group.<br />
The generalized von Bertalanffy with tM (eq. 42, p. 175) is at <strong>the</strong><br />
same time a 'dimensional', a 'transitional' and a 'metabolic time' <strong>model</strong>. It<br />
represents <strong>the</strong> highest level <strong>of</strong> generalization in <strong>the</strong> "von Bertalanffy 1"<br />
family but it spans a large space for deriving o<strong>the</strong>r kinds <strong>of</strong> <strong>model</strong>s.<br />
Finally, <strong>the</strong>re are some unclassifiable <strong>model</strong>s, such as Gompertz,<br />
Johnson, Jolicoeur and Tanaka. Ei<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong>y are purely descriptive<br />
<strong>model</strong>s that just mimic <strong>the</strong> shape <strong>of</strong> some functional <strong>model</strong>s, or <strong>the</strong>ir<br />
affinity is not established yet. In <strong>the</strong> first case, <strong>the</strong>y have clearly no place<br />
in <strong>the</strong> proposed functional classification, as it is <strong>the</strong> case for o<strong>the</strong>r purely<br />
descriptive <strong>model</strong>s (e.g., Rao's polynomial growth <strong>model</strong>; Rao, 1965;<br />
Basu, 1999). In <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r case, a reparameterization or a good example <strong>of</strong> a<br />
functional use is probably required to reveal <strong>the</strong>ir real nature.<br />
Much space is left empty in this typology for adding new functional<br />
<strong>model</strong>s when growth <strong>of</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r animals and plants will be described in a<br />
functional way. Such a classification should help choosing <strong>the</strong> right growth<br />
187